Intervention effectmodel-written summary

P application did not alter rhizobial competition for cowpea nodulation sites.

A claim from LOCALIZED INCREASE IN NODULE ACTIVITY BUT NO COMPETITIVE INTERACTION OF COWPEA RHIZOBIA DUE TO PRE‐ESTABLISHMENT OF VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA · 1987

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P application did not alter rhizobial competition for cowpea nodulation sites.

Treatment
P applicatione0
Interactor
rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
competitive interaction by rhizobia for nodulation sitese0
Direction
neithere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Strain TAL 173 was detected from 95% of the nodules and neither the VAM fungus nor P application affected competitive interaction by rhizobia for nodulation sites.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1177–1340
t0

“COWPEA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–78

Title

LOCALIZED INCREASE IN NODULE ACTIVITY BUT NO COMPETITIVE INTERACTION OF COWPEA RHIZOBIA DUE TO PRE‐ESTABLISHMENT OF VESICULAR‐ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZA

ROBERT N. AMES; GABOR J. BETHLENFALVAY New Phytologist 1987. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00136.x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-f1d5b02538463010b0c9ac085f9b3e64174277302b23a0b8f1c518fe7a9a3770 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.