Paper · 2016 · Experimental Agriculture

COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA) CROPS IN AFRICA CAN RESPOND TO INOCULATION WITH RHIZOBIUM

ROBERT M. BODDEY; MATHIAS FOSU; WILLIAMS K. ATAKORA; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
27
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) is the most important food grain legume in Africa. Cowpea is nodulated by rhizobium bacteria in almost all soils of the tropics, but studies performed in the 1970s and 1980s in Nigeria suggested only modest responses of grain yield in the field to inoculation of selected rhizobium strains. More recently, experiments performed in Brazil have shown that cowpea responded to inoculation of rhizobium selected locally and grain yields increased by up to 30%. We tested some of the Brazilian strains on cowpea at a site in northern Mozambique and at several sites in Northern Ghana. At all sites phosphorus fertilizer (26 kg P ha −1 ) was added to all plots. At the site in Mozambique despite considerable damage to the crop by the parasitic yellow witchweed ( Alectra vogelii ), grain yields were more than doubled by inoculation of one of the Brazilian strains and reached 1.4 Mg ha −1 . In on-station experiments conducted in 2012 in June and August in northern Ghana using the local cowpea variety Padi-Tuya as the test crop, nodule weight at 35 days after planting (dap) tripled with rhizobium strain BR 3299 (530 mg plant −1 ) in August with the other inoculants (BR 3267 and a mixture of BR 3267 and BR 3299) also increased nodule weight to over 300 mg plant −1 . In the first on-station experiment, grain yields were doubled by the inoculation of any of the three rhizobium strains, and in the second experiment, significant increases in grain yield ranged from 39% to 57% and reached over 2.0 Mg ha −1 . Similar increases in nodulation and grain yield due to inoculation were observed in 22 on-farm trials. Nitrogen fertilizer application promoted vegetative growth but did not increase grain yield and nodulation. Inoculating cowpea with highly effective rhizobium strains can therefore enhance grain yield of smallholder farmers in Africa.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Mozambique, inoculation with one of the Brazilian rhizobium strains more than doubled cowpea grain yield, which reached 1.4 Mg/ha despite witchweed damage.

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
inoculation of one of the Brazilian strainse1
Interactor
Brazilian strainse1symbiont
Second interactor
Alectra vogeliiAlectra vogeliie1parasite
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
more than doublede1
Value
1.4 Mg ha −1e1
Qualifier
despite considerable damage to the crop by the parasitic yellow witchweed ( Alectra vogelii )e1
Setting
Mozambiquee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alectra vogelii
Alectra vogelii · Second interactorSAplants · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“At the site in Mozambique despite considerable damage to the crop by the parasitic yellow witchweed ( Alectra vogelii ), grain yields were more than doubled by inoculation of one of the Brazilian strains and reached 1.4 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 699–927 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In northern Ghana, rhizobium strain BR 3299 tripled cowpea nodule weight at 35 days after planting in August (530 mg per plant).

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Material
Padi-Tuyae1
Organ / stage
35 days after planting (dap)e1
Treatment
rhizobium strain BR 3299e1
Interactor
rhizobium strain BR 3299Rhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodule weight at 35 days after planting (dap)e1
Direction
triplede1
Value
530 mg plant −1e1
Qualifier
in Auguste1
Setting
northern Ghanae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“In on-station experiments conducted in 2012 in June and August in northern Ghana using the local cowpea variety Padi-Tuya as the test crop, nodule weight at 35 days after planting (dap) tripled with rhizobium strain BR 3299 (530 mg plant −1 ) in August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other inoculants, including BR 3267 and a mixture of BR 3267 and BR 3299, increased cowpea nodule weight to over 300 mg per plant.

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
the other inoculantse1
Interactor
BR 3267e1symbiont
Outcome
nodule weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
over 300 mg plant −1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the other inoculants (BR 3267 and a mixture of BR 3267 and BR 3299) also increased nodule weight to over 300 mg plant −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first on-station experiment, inoculation with any of three rhizobium strains doubled cowpea grain yield.

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
inoculation of any of the three rhizobium strainse1
Interactor
rhizobium strainsRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
doublede1
Setting
on-station experimente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the first on-station experiment, grain yields were doubled by the inoculation of any of the three rhizobium strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1311–1429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second experiment, inoculation increased cowpea grain yield significantly by 39% to 57%, reaching over 2.0 Mg/ha.

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Inoculating cowpea with highly effective rhizobium strainse2
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Value
39% to 57%e1
Qualifier
reached over 2.0 Mg ha −1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the second experiment, significant increases in grain yield ranged from 39% to 57% and reached over 2.0 Mg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1550 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculating cowpea with highly effective rhizobium strains can therefore enhance grain yield of smallholder farmers in Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation of cowpea gave similar increases in nodulation and grain yield in 22 on-farm trials.

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Outcome
nodulation and grain yielde1
Direction
increasese1
Setting
on-farm trialse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Similar increases in nodulation and grain yield due to inoculation were observed in 22 on-farm trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1654 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer application promoted cowpea vegetative growth.

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
vegetative growthe1
Direction
promotede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen fertilizer application promoted vegetative growth but did not increase grain yield and nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer application did not increase cowpea grain yield or nodulation.

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Nitrogen fertilizer applicatione1
Outcome
grain yield and nodulatione1
Direction
did not increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen fertilizer application promoted vegetative growth but did not increase grain yield and nodulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1762 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that inoculating cowpea with highly effective rhizobium strains can enhance grain yield of smallholder farmers in Africa.

Taxon
COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Inoculating cowpea with highly effective rhizobium strainse1
Outcome
grain yield of smallholder farmerse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–26 · show in text ↑
e1

“Inoculating cowpea with highly effective rhizobium strains can therefore enhance grain yield of smallholder farmers in Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1889 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 131 positive, 12 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.