Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Commercial rhizobial inoculation did not significantly affect cowpea nodulation, biomass yield, or shoot nitrogen content compared with controls.

A claim from Potential of indigenous bradyrhizobia versus commercial inoculants to improve cowpea (Vigna unguiculataL. walp.) and green gram (Vigna radiataL. wilczek.) yields in Kenya · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial rhizobial inoculation did not significantly affect cowpea nodulation, biomass yield, or shoot nitrogen content compared with controls.

Treatment
Rhizobial inoculatione0
Outcome
nodulation, biomass yield and shoot N contente0
Direction
did not significantly (P < 0.05) affecte0
Comparator
controlse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizobial inoculation did not significantly (P < 0.05) affect nodulation, biomass yield and shoot N content in cowpea and green gram compared with controls.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1548

Title

Potential of indigenous bradyrhizobia versus commercial inoculants to improve cowpea (Vigna unguiculataL. walp.) and green gram (Vigna radiataL. wilczek.) yields in Kenya

Samuel Mathu; Laetitia Herrmann; Pieter Pypers; et al. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 2012. doi:10.1080/00380768.2012.741041

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-2bbfc0dc725934b57061a2629219ebe0e6d8c218dbd22d99e3da4a1479721efe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 57 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

60 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.