Paper · 2018 · Agronomy Journal

Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation

Elson B. da Silva Júnior; Vinício Oliosi Favero; Gustavo R. Xavier; et al.

7
claims
28
verbatim quotes
29
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Cowpea cropping after soybean is increasing in the Cerrado region of Brazil and can benefit from BNF. Soybean bradyrhizobia can abundantly nodulate cowpea but are often inefficient. Inoculated elite cowpea Bradyrhizobium strains increased grain yields. Nitrogen fixation inputs were increased by inoculation with selected cowpea bradyrhizobia. Nitrogen‐15 natural abundance showed inoculation increased N 2 fixation by over 25 kg N ha –1 crop –1 . Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata Walp.) is increasingly planted as a second season crop after soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in the Brazilian Cerrado region. Experiments were conducted at Sinop and Primavera do Leste in Mato Grosso State to investigate the impact of cowpea inoculation with recommended rhizobium strains on biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) and grain yield. Plants were either non‐inoculated, with or without 70 kg N fertilizer ha − , or inoculated with five rhizobium strains, separately or as a mixture. Nodulation and shoot dry matter (DM) were evaluated at 35 d after emergence (DAE). Dry matter and N accumulation were evaluated and BNF contributions quantified using 15 N natural abundance at 50 DAE. Nodule number and dry weight were high regardless of inoculation treatment. However, several of the inoculation treatments at Sinop and Primavera do Leste promoted significant increases in total N at 50 DAE. At both sites, the 15 N abundance results indicated that inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop and from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera. Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste, and from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop. The results indicate inoculation of cowpea with elite rhizobium strains can increase BNF contributions and grain yields in the Brazilian Cerrado region, even when there are abundant populations of soybean rhizobium present in the soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea nodule number and dry weight were high across inoculation treatments.

Outcome
Nodule number and dry weighte0e1e2e3
Direction
highe0e1e2e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodule number and dry weight were high regardless of inoculation treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1256 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“At both sites, the 15 N abundance results indicated that inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop and from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1572 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste, and from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Several inoculation treatments increased cowpea total nitrogen at 50 days after emergence.

Treatment
inoculation treatmentse0e1e2e3
Outcome
total Ne0e1e2e3
Direction
increasese0e1e2e3
Qualifier
50 DAEe0e1e2e3
Setting
Sinop and Primavera do Lestee0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“several of the inoculation treatments at Sinop and Primavera do Leste promoted significant increases in total N at 50 DAE.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1388 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“At both sites, the 15 N abundance results indicated that inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop and from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1572 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste, and from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased biological nitrogen fixation from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop.

Treatment
inoculatione0e1e2e3
Outcome
BNF contributionse0e1e2e3
Direction
increasede0e1e2e3
Value
36 to 64 kg ha −e0e1e2e3
Setting
Sinope0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1530 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“At both sites, the 15 N abundance results indicated that inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop and from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1572 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste, and from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased biological nitrogen fixation from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.

Treatment
inoculatione0e1e2e3
Outcome
BNF contributionse0e1e2e3
Direction
increasede0e1e2e3
Value
48 to 75 kg N ha −e0e1e2e3
Setting
Primaverae0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1572 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“At both sites, the 15 N abundance results indicated that inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop and from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1572 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste, and from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BR 3262 increased cowpea grain yield at Primavera do Leste from about 1200 to 1500 kg ha −.

Treatment
BR 3262e0e1e2e3
Interactor
BR 3262e0e1e2e3symbiont
Outcome
Grain yielde0e1e2e3
Direction
increasede0e1e2e3
Value
approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha −e0e1e2e3
Setting
Primavera do Lestee0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1713 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“At both sites, the 15 N abundance results indicated that inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop and from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1572 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste, and from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

INPA 03-11B increased cowpea grain yield at Primavera do Leste from about 1200 to 1500 kg ha −.

Treatment
INPA 03‐11Be0e1e2e3
Interactor
INPA 03‐11Be0e1e2e3symbiont
Outcome
Grain yielde0e1e2e3
Direction
increasede0e1e2e3
Value
approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha −e0e1e2e3
Setting
Primavera do Lestee0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1713 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“At both sites, the 15 N abundance results indicated that inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop and from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1572 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste, and from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1785 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BR 3262 increased cowpea grain yield at Sinop from about 850 to 1400 kg ha −.

Treatment
BR 3262e0e1e2e3
Interactor
BR 3262e0e1e2e3symbiont
Outcome
Grain yielde0e1e2e3
Direction
increasede0e1e2e3
Value
approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha −e0e1e2e3
Setting
Sinope0e1e2e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1785 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium Inoculation of Cowpea in Brazilian Cerrado Increases Yields and Nitrogen Fixation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–91 · show in text ↑
e2

“At both sites, the 15 N abundance results indicated that inoculation significantly increased BNF contributions from 36 to 64 kg ha − at Sinop and from 48 to 75 kg N ha − at Primavera.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1572 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grain yield was significantly increased from approximately 1200 to 1500 kg ha − by strains BR 3262 and INPA 03‐11B at the Primavera do Leste, and from approximately 850 to 1400 kg ha − by strain BR 3262 at Sinop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1785 · show in text ↑

brassinolide · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

69 papers: 57 positive, 12 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 41 positive, 2 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.