Paper · 2019 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Combined application of inoculant, phosphorus and organic manure improves grain yield of cowpea

Jacob Ulzen; Robert Clement Abaidoo; Nana Ewusi-Mensah; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Low concentrations of P and organic manure in savanna soils limit cowpea response to rhizobia. The study was conducted to determine the combined effect of P and organic manure on cowpea response to rhizobia in a factorial experiment arranged in randomized complete block design with three replications on smallholder farmers’ fields in northern Ghana in 2015. The factors were two levels of Bradyrhizobium inoculant, two levels of P fertilizer, three treatments of manure (fertisoil, cattle manure, and no manure). Addition of Bradyrhizobium inoculant to P and fertisoil significantly increased shoot biomass yield from 1677 kg ha−1 in the plots without Bradyrhizobium inoculation to 1913 kg ha−1. Likewise, the addition of Bradyrhizobium inoculant to P and cattle manure significantly increased shoot biomass from 1437 kg ha−1 to 1813 kg ha−1. Grain yield increases of 1427 and 1278 kg ha−1 were obtained over the control when either fertisoil or cattle manure and P, respectively, were added to Bradyrhizobium inoculant. The value cost ratio for adding Bradyrhizobium inoculant to phosphorus and fertisoil was two indicating that it could be attractive to risk-averse smallholder farmers. The study demonstrated the potential of the combined application of organic matter and P to improve cowpea response to Bradyrhizobium inoculation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Bradyrhizobium inoculant to P and fertisoil increased cowpea shoot biomass yield from 1677 to 1913 kg ha−1.

Treatment
Addition of Bradyrhizobium inoculant to P and fertisoile0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomass yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1913 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
1677 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
plots without Bradyrhizobium inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of Bradyrhizobium inoculant to P and fertisoil significantly increased shoot biomass yield from 1677 kg ha−1 in the plots without Bradyrhizobium inoculation to 1913 kg ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–697 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Bradyrhizobium inoculant to P and cattle manure increased cowpea shoot biomass from 1437 to 1813 kg ha−1.

Treatment
addition of Bradyrhizobium inoculant to P and cattle manuree0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1813 kg ha−1e0
Qualifier
1437 kg ha−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Likewise, the addition of Bradyrhizobium inoculant to P and cattle manure significantly increased shoot biomass from 1437 kg ha−1 to 1813 kg ha−1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–844 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertisoil and P added to Bradyrhizobium inoculant increased cowpea grain yield by 1427 kg ha−1 over control.

Treatment
fertisoil or cattle manure and Pe0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
1427e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increases of 1427 and 1278 kg ha−1 were obtained over the control when either fertisoil or cattle manure and P, respectively, were added to Bradyrhizobium inoculant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cattle manure and P added to Bradyrhizobium inoculant increased cowpea grain yield by 1278 kg ha−1 over control.

Treatment
cattle manure and Pe0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
1278 kg ha−1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield increases of 1427 and 1278 kg ha−1 were obtained over the control when either fertisoil or cattle manure and P, respectively, were added to Bradyrhizobium inoculant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–1022 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The value cost ratio for adding Bradyrhizobium inoculant to phosphorus and fertisoil was two.

Treatment
adding Bradyrhizobium inoculant to phosphorus and fertisoile0
Interactor
BradyrhizobiumBradyrhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
value cost ratioe0
Value
twoe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bradyrhizobium
Bradyrhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Louisa Howard - Dartmouth Electron Microscope Facility · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The value cost ratio for adding Bradyrhizobium inoculant to phosphorus and fertisoil was two indicating that it could be attractive to risk-averse smallholder farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The combined application could be attractive to risk-averse smallholder farmers.

Treatment
adding Bradyrhizobium inoculant to phosphorus and fertisoile0
Outcome
attractive to risk-averse smallholder farmerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The value cost ratio for adding Bradyrhizobium inoculant to phosphorus and fertisoil was two indicating that it could be attractive to risk-averse smallholder farmers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1190 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑

Bradyrhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Bradyrhizobium · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

143 papers: 131 positive, 12 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

139 papers more in this group

See all 143 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.