Abstract
In the northeastern of Pará, cowpea is one of the main protein sources of the population. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of liming, the P and K mineral fertilization, and the combination of seed inoculation with Rhizobium associated with mineral N supplementation in the growth and production of cowpea cultivars. Two experiments were carried out in two consecutive years at the Federal Rural University of Amazonia (Capitão Poço-PA). A randomized block experimental design with subdivided plots was used with four replications, two cowpea cultivars (BRS Tapaihum and BRS Marataoã) and six fertilization and liming treatments: i) without fertilization and without liming; ii) P and K mineral fertilization, liming and seed inoculation with Rhizobium; iii) P and K mineral fertilization and seed inoculation with Rhizobium; iv) N, P and K mineral fertilization and liming; v) P and K mineral fertilization and liming; and vi) N, P and K mineral fertilization, liming and seed inoculation with Rhizobium. Cowpea responded to liming and P and K mineral fertilization, but not N fertilization. There was no difference between the supply of N through seed inoculation or mineral fertilization. Thus, it is suggested to inoculate seeds with Rhizobium in order to maintain the soil N reserve.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea growth and production responded to liming and P and K mineral fertilization.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- liming and P and K mineral fertilizatione1
- Outcome
- Growth and productiont0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Growth and production of cowpea”
e1“Cowpea responded to liming and P and K mineral fertilization, but not N fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea growth and production did not respond to N fertilization.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- N fertilizatione1
- Outcome
- Growth and productiont0
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Growth and production of cowpea”
e1“Cowpea responded to liming and P and K mineral fertilization, but not N fertilization”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed inoculation with Rhizobium is recommended to maintain the soil N reserve in cowpea.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Outcome
- inoculate seeds with Rhizobiume3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Growth and production of cowpea”
e3“it is suggested to inoculate seeds with Rhizobium in order to maintain the soil N reserve”
The same questions in other papers
phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
109 papers more in this group
See all 113 papers →lime · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →potassium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
288 papers more in this group
See all 292 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.