Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Virus-inoculated cowpea had significantly lower growth and yield than buffer controls.

A claim from Interactions of viruses in Cowpea: effects on growth and yield parameters. · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus-inoculated cowpea had significantly lower growth and yield than buffer controls.

Treatment
virus inoculatede1
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
buffer inoculated control plantse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cowpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–90
e1

“growth and yield of the buffer inoculated control plants were significantly higher than those of the virus inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–549

Title

Interactions of viruses in Cowpea: effects on growth and yield parameters.

KT Kareem; MA Taiwo Virology Journal 2007. doi:10.1186/1743-422x-4-15

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-2b2d7d7d9fdc55c72a53bc46413cbaaa82f87e2475a7d82e64dafc74a36fa015 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this claim · 99 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.