Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2008 at Junagadh on effect of bio fertilizer and fertility levels on yield, protein content and nutrient uptake of cowpea. Sixteen treatments comprising of four levels of bio fertilizer viz., without inoculation, with PSB inoculation, liquid PSB inoculation and Rhizobium inoculation and four fertility levels viz., 0, 50, 75 and 100 % RDF were tried in factorial randomized block design with four replications. The result of the experiment indicated that significantly the highest grain and stover yield of 1441 and 1716 kg/ha respectively, was recorded in seed inoculation by Rhizobium over rest of the treatments. The increased in RDF significantly increased seed and stover yield. Inoculated with Rhizobium significantly increased protein and N, P content as well as uptake of N and P by grain and stover. The 100 % RDF recorded the highest protein content as well as content and uptake of N and P by grain and stover but was par with 75 % RDF. Significant improvement in available N and P status in soil was also reported due to Rhizobium inoculation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation produced the highest grain yield of 1441 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatat0 - Treatment
- seed inoculation by Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- grain and stover yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1441e0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly the highest grain and stover yield of 1441 and 1716 kg/ha respectively, was recorded in seed inoculation by Rhizobium over rest of the treatments”
t0“Yield, Protein Content and Nutrient Uptake of Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation produced the highest stover yield of 1716 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- seed inoculation by Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- stover yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1716 kg/hae0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly the highest grain and stover yield of 1441 and 1716 kg/ha respectively, was recorded in seed inoculation by Rhizobium over rest of the treatments”
t0“Yield, Protein Content and Nutrient Uptake of Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing RDF increased seed and stover yield.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- increased in RDFe0
- Outcome
- seed and stover yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increased in RDF significantly increased seed and stover yield.”
t0“Yield, Protein Content and Nutrient Uptake of Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation increased protein and N and P content.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- Inoculated with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- protein and N, P contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculated with Rhizobium significantly increased protein and N, P content as well as uptake of N and P by grain and stover.”
t0“Yield, Protein Content and Nutrient Uptake of Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation increased N and P uptake by grain and stover.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- Inoculated with Rhizobiume0
- Outcome
- uptake of N and P by grain and stovere0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Inoculated with Rhizobium significantly increased protein and N, P content as well as uptake of N and P by grain and stover.”
t0“Yield, Protein Content and Nutrient Uptake of Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
At 100 % RDF, protein content was highest and comparable to 75 % RDF.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- 100 % RDFe0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- 75 % RDFe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 100 % RDF recorded the highest protein content as well as content and uptake of N and P by grain and stover but was par with 75 % RDF.”
t0“Yield, Protein Content and Nutrient Uptake of Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
At 100 % RDF, N and P content and uptake by grain and stover were highest and comparable to 75 % RDF.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- 100 % RDFe0
- Outcome
- content and uptake of N and P by grain and stovere0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- 75 % RDFe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The 100 % RDF recorded the highest protein content as well as content and uptake of N and P by grain and stover but was par with 75 % RDF.”
t0“Yield, Protein Content and Nutrient Uptake of Cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium inoculation improved available soil N and P.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium inoculatione0
- Outcome
- available N and P status in soile0
- Direction
- improvemente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significant improvement in available N and P status in soil was also reported due to Rhizobium inoculation.”
t0“Yield, Protein Content and Nutrient Uptake of Cowpea”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Rhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
46 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- negative
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
74 papers more in this group
See all 78 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.