Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Integrated Nutrient Management in Summer Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Under South Gujarat Condition

K.L. Pargi; R.L. Leva; H.Y. Vaghasiya; et al.

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
12
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment entitled “Integrated nutrient management in summer cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) under South Gujarat condition” conducted at Navsari with eight treatment combinations replicated thrice in factorial randomized block design during the summer season of 2016. The treatment consisted combinations of two levels of inorganic fertilizers (F1:50 % RDF, F2:100 % RDF); two levels organic manures (O1: FYM @ 0 t ha-1, O2: FYM @ 2.5 t ha-1) and two levels bio-fertilizers (B1: No inoculation, B2: seed inoculation with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria). As regards the growth parameters the higher plant height (cm), number of branches per plant, days to 50 % flowering, number of nodules per plant, dry matter per plant (g), number of pod per plant, number of seed per pod, 100 seed weight (g), higher grain (kg ha-1), haulm yield (kg ha-1), harvest index (%) were significantly increased to a greater extent by the treatment 100 % RDF (F2), FYM @ 2.5 t ha-1 (O2) and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (B2) which was found significantly differ from the 50 % RDF (F1), FYM @ 0 t ha-1 (O1) and No inoculation (B1) treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The three higher nutrient and inoculation treatments significantly increased cowpea growth traits compared with their lower counterparts.

Taxon
summer cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
100 % RDF (F2), FYM @ 2.5 t ha-1 (O2) and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (B2)e2
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume2symbiont
Second interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae2symbiont
Outcome
plant height (cm), number of branches per plante1
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
50 % RDF (F1), FYM @ 0 t ha-1 (O1) and No inoculation (B1)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“summer cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“the higher plant height (cm), number of branches per plant, days to 50 % flowering, number of nodules per plant, dry matter per plant (g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–746 · show in text ↑
e2

“were significantly increased to a greater extent by the treatment 100 % RDF (F2), FYM @ 2.5 t ha-1 (O2) and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (B2) which was found significantly differ from the 50 % RDF (F1), FYM @ 0 t ha-1 (O1) and No inoculation (B1) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher nutrient and inoculation treatments significantly increased cowpea yield components and yields.

Taxon
summer cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
Treatment
100 % RDF (F2), FYM @ 2.5 t ha-1 (O2) and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (B2)e1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Second interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteriae1symbiont
Outcome
number of pod per plant, number of seed per pod, 100 seed weight (g)e1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
50 % RDF (F1), FYM @ 0 t ha-1 (O1) and No inoculation (B1)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“summer cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 63–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of pod per plant, number of seed per pod, 100 seed weight (g), higher grain (kg ha-1), haulm yield (kg ha-1), harvest index (%) were significantly increased to a greater extent by the treatment 100 % RDF (F2), FYM @ 2.5 t ha-1 (O2) and seed inoculation with Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (B2) which was found significantly differ from the 50 % RDF (F1), FYM @ 0 t ha-1 (O1) and No inoculation (B1) treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–1180 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

47 papers: 47 positive, 0 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.