Intervention effectmodel-written summary

T6 produced significantly higher K content (1.45%) in fodder cowpea or postharvest soil.

A claim from Effect of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Fodder Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T6 produced significantly higher K content (1.45%) in fodder cowpea or postharvest soil.

Taxon
fodder cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]Vigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
100% RDF (N,P,K) along with biofertilizers (rhizobium, PSB, potassium and zinc solubilizer bacteria)e0
Outcome
K contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.45%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% RDF (N,P,K) along with biofertilizers (rhizobium, PSB, potassium and zinc solubilizer bacteria) (T6) gave significantly (P less than 0.05) higher in plant height (204.6 cm), primary branches (6.1), root length (24.47 cm), green matter yield (334.5 q ha-1), CGR (8.13 g m-2 day-1), RGR (4.68 g g-1 day-1), K content (1.45%) in plant, P uptake (23.01 kg ha-1) and K uptake (86.04 kg ha-1) and available Zn status (0.465 ppm) in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–659
t0

“fodder cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 100–144

Title

Effect of Organic and Inorganic Nutrient Sources on Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Fodder Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.]

Susanta Dutta; Magan Singh; Rajesh Kumar Meena; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2020. doi:10.18805/lr-4181

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e7229bc6e7e2e5b181403451040fda28d660810cbd50ec141671601c08e28eea · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
    TSP and no phosphorus supported higher cowpea grain weight and P uptake than RP and SSP.

    Evaluation of phosphorus fertilizer rates for maize and sources for cowpea on different soil types in southwestern Nigeria · 2010 · compared with rock phosphate (RP) and single super phosphate (SSP)

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

3 of 6 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.