Paper · 2015 · Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition

Effect of Phosphorus and Zinc Application on Nutritional Characteristics of Fodder Cowpea ( Vigna unguiculata )

Deepak Kumar Rathore; Rakesh Kumar; Magan Singh; et al.

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment consisting of four phosphorus levels (0, 40, 60 and 80 kg/ha P2O5) and five zinc levels (0, 10, 20, 30 and 40 kg/ha ZnSO4) was laid out in factorial randomized block design to find out the effect on yield and nutritive value of fodder cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Application of 60 kg/ha phosphorus recorded 27.64 t/ha yield which was 7.50 and 55.6% higher than 40 kg/ha and no phosphorus application, respectively. Application of Zn in the form of ZnSO4 @ 20 kg/ha increased (P<0.05) the green fodder yield (25.89 t/ha). The successive increase in P level from 0 to 60 kg P2O5/ha enhanced CP level significantly (P<0.05) from 15.07 to 17.97%. Zinc application also increased CP content from 15.23 to 17.56% with increase in ZnSO4 level from 0 to 20 kg/ha. The content of NDF and ADF were not influenced due to application of Zn and P. The interaction effects of P and Zn were found to be significant (P<0.05) with respect to P and Zn concentration. P and Zn content in cowpea fodder showed declining trend at application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4. Therefore, a combination of 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4 could be applied to obtain better yield and nutritive value of fodder cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg/ha phosphorus yielded 27.64 t/ha of fodder cowpea, 7.50% above 40 kg/ha phosphorus.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
60 kg/ha phosphoruse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.64 t/hae0
Qualifier
7.50e0
Comparator
40 kg/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg/ha phosphorus recorded 27.64 t/ha yield which was 7.50 and 55.6% higher than 40 kg/ha and no phosphorus application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 60 kg/ha phosphorus yielded 27.64 t/ha of fodder cowpea, 55.6% above no phosphorus application.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
60 kg/ha phosphoruse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.64 t/hae0
Qualifier
55.6%e0
Comparator
no phosphorus applicatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 60 kg/ha phosphorus recorded 27.64 t/ha yield which was 7.50 and 55.6% higher than 40 kg/ha and no phosphorus application, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 at 20 kg/ha increased green fodder yield to 25.89 t/ha.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
ZnSO4 @ 20 kg/hae0
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
25.89 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Zn in the form of ZnSO4 @ 20 kg/ha increased (P<0.05) the green fodder yield (25.89 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing P from 0 to 60 kg P2O5/ha significantly raised crude protein from 15.07 to 17.97%.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
P level from 0 to 60 kg P2O5/hae0
Outcome
CP levele0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
15.07 to 17.97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The successive increase in P level from 0 to 60 kg P2O5/ha enhanced CP level significantly (P<0.05) from 15.07 to 17.97%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–655 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing ZnSO4 from 0 to 20 kg/ha raised crude protein content from 15.23 to 17.56%.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
ZnSO4 level from 0 to 20 kg/hae0
Outcome
CP contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
15.23 to 17.56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc application also increased CP content from 15.23 to 17.56% with increase in ZnSO4 level from 0 to 20 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc and phosphorus application did not influence NDF and ADF contents.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
application of Zn and Pe0
Outcome
content of NDF and ADFe0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The content of NDF and ADF were not influenced due to application of Zn and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The P by Zn interaction significantly affected fodder P concentration.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
P and Zne0
Outcome
P and Zn concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effects of P and Zn were found to be significant (P<0.05) with respect to P and Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The P by Zn interaction significantly affected fodder Zn concentration.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
P and Zne0
Outcome
Zn concentratione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effects of P and Zn were found to be significant (P<0.05) with respect to P and Zn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–961 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea fodder P content declined above 60 kg/ha P2O5.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
more than 60 kg/ha P2O5e0
Outcome
P and Zn content in cowpea foddere0
Direction
declininge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P and Zn content in cowpea fodder showed declining trend at application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea fodder Zn content declined above 20 kg/ha ZnSO4.

Taxon
Fodder Cowpeat0
Treatment
20 kg/ha ZnSO4e0
Outcome
Zn content in cowpea foddere0
Direction
declininge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“P and Zn content in cowpea fodder showed declining trend at application rate more than 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fodder Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–89 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 60 kg/ha P2O5 with 20 kg/ha ZnSO4 for better fodder cowpea yield and nutritive value.

Taxon
fodder cowpeae0
Treatment
60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4e0
Outcome
better yield and nutritive valuee0

Verbatim

e0

“a combination of 60 kg/ha P2O5 and 20 kg/ha ZnSO4 could be applied to obtain better yield and nutritive value of fodder cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1221 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

phosphorus · quality: grain · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.