Claim · model-written summary
Dry leafy forage yield did not differ significantly among pasture combinations.
- Taxon
- Ber
Ziziphus mauritianat0 - Treatment
- different pasture combinationse0
- Outcome
- Dry leafy forage yielde0
- Direction
- not significantly influencede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Dry leafy forage yield and fuel wood production of ber was not significantly influenced by different pasture combinations.”
t0“Ber”
Title
Shri Ram; Sunil Kumar Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2011
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Pruning ber at 20 cm increased pasture dry forage yield to 4.26 t/ha versus 60 cm.
- Intervention effect Pruning ber at 20 cm increased pasture crude protein yield to 319.9 kg/ha versus 60 cm.
- Intervention effect Pruning at 60 cm significantly increased dry leafy forage yield to 4.11.
- Intervention effect Pruning at 60 cm significantly increased fruit yield to 23.41.
- Intervention effect Pruning at 60 cm significantly increased fuel wood to 36.34 kg/tree.
- Intervention effect Guinea grass with Stylosanthes hamata increased dry forage to 6.34 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Guinea grass with Stylosanthes hamata increased crude protein yield to 455.3 kg/ha.
- Intervention effect fuel wood production did not differ significantly among pasture combinations.
- Intervention effect Natural pasture yielded 24.91 kg/tree of ber fruit, higher than intercropping.
- Intervention effect Pruning at 40 cm produced maximum net returns of 40032/ha.
- Intervention effect Pruning at 40 cm produced maximum net returns per investment of 2.14.
- Intervention effect Guinea grass and S. hamata intercropping gave highest net returns of 33693/ha.
- Intervention effect Natural pasture gave maximum net returns per investment of 1.96.