Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All cooking methods significantly reduced the contents of VOCs such as alcohols, aldehydes and ketones in faba leaves compared with fresh leaves.

A claim from Improving the Antioxidant Activity and Flavor of Faba (Vicia faba L.) Leaves by Domestic Cooking Methods · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All cooking methods significantly reduced the contents of VOCs such as alcohols, aldehydes and ketones in faba leaves compared with fresh leaves.

Taxon
Vicia faba L.Vicia fabat0
Treatment
All cooking methodse6
Outcome
contents of VOCs such as alcohols, aldehydes, and ketonese6
Direction
reducede6
Comparator
fresh leavese6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Vicia faba L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–68
e6

“All cooking methods potentially improved the flavor of the cooked faba leaves compared with that of the fresh leaves, because they significantly reduced the contents of VOCs such as alcohols, aldehydes, and ketones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1554

Title

Improving the Antioxidant Activity and Flavor of Faba (Vicia faba L.) Leaves by Domestic Cooking Methods

Shucheng Duan; Soon-Jae Kwon; Chan Saem Gil; et al. Antioxidants 2022. doi:10.3390/antiox11050931

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e7d0a4db21cb3d0a55ac2bee7360c17416d27a43dc9580f77957fb2f9cb63d3c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.