Claim · model-written summary
G. urbanum regrowth was negatively affected by acid soil, in the reported 0.3–0.5 ratio range.
- Taxon
- G. urbanum
_Geum_urbanum_-_Habit.jpg?width=60)
Geum urbanume0 - Treatment
- acide1
- Outcome
- biomasse1
- Direction
- negatively affectede0
- Value
- 0.3–0.5e0
- Comparator
- reference soilse1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_Geum_urbanum_-_Habit.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“G. urbanum, M. muralis, S. nemorum and V. officinalis were negatively affected (ratios 0.3–0.5)”
e1“biomass in acid compared to reference soils”
Title
U FALKENGREN-GRERUP Annals of Botany 1998. doi:10.1006/anbo.1998.0761
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Association The herbs differed in soil responses in a way reflecting their field distributions.
- Observation The most acid-tolerant species all survived both soil treatments.
- Intervention effect More sensitive species had lower survival following acid rather than reference soil exposure.
- Intervention effect C. pilulifera regrowth biomass was unaffected by acid soil, with an acid/reference ratio of 0.8.
- Intervention effect L. pilosa regrowth biomass was unaffected by acid soil, with an acid/reference ratio of 1.1.
- Intervention effect M. muralis regrowth was negatively affected by acid soil, in the reported 0.3–0.5 ratio range.
- Intervention effect S. nemorum regrowth was negatively affected by acid soil, in the reported 0.3–0.5 ratio range.
- Intervention effect V. officinalis regrowth was negatively affected by acid soil, in the reported 0.3–0.5 ratio range.
- Observation Above- and below-ground biomass responses were broadly similar.