Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment with PGPR significantly increased shoot dry weight and the amount of nitrogen fixed.

A claim from PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA INCREASE GROWTH, YIELD AND NITROGEN FIXATION INPHASEOLUS VULGARIS · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment with PGPR significantly increased shoot dry weight and the amount of nitrogen fixed.

Taxon
PHASEOLUS VULGARISPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
Treatment with PGPRe0
Interactor
PGPRe0other
Outcome
shoot dry weight, amount of nitrogen fixede1
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PHASEOLUS VULGARIS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–102
e0

“Treatment with PGPR significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–972
e1

“shoot dry weight, amount of nitrogen fixed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1045

Title

PLANT GROWTH PROMOTING RHIZOBACTERIA INCREASE GROWTH, YIELD AND NITROGEN FIXATION INPHASEOLUS VULGARIS

Mehrab Yadegari; H. Asadi Rahmani; G. Noormohammadi; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2010. doi:10.1080/01904167.2010.503776

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-e7d8b81c25f439f04d1dcd44826b6259d6583e11fcd2cbd26280a58c26b7f9af · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Co-inoculation of common bean with Rhizobium and Pseudomonas sp. LG improved shoot dry weight, nitrogen and phosphorus contents compared with Rhizobium alone.

    Improvement of common bean growth by co-inoculation with Rhizobium and plant growth-promoting bacteria · 2011 · compared with inoculation with Rhizobium alone

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Synchronized inoculation suppressed plant growth versus controls.

    Interaction between Meloidogyne incognita and Rhizoctonia solani on green beans · 2015 · compared with controls

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Nematodes significantly decreased plant dry weight from day 8.

    Response of Phaseol Us Vulgaris To a Single Generation of Meloidogyne Incognita · 1985 · compared with 0

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Rhizoctonia solani inoculation had the most adverse effect on seedling emergence.

    Reaction of dry bean cultivars grown in western Canada to root rot inoculation · 2014

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Inoculation with H. seropedicae SMR1 suggested a negative effect on the dry weight of common bean.

    Evidence for the endophytic colonization of Phaseolus vulgaris(common bean) roots by the diazotroph Herbaspirillum seropedicae · 2011

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Inoculation did not improve Royalnel plant growth in Chrifet soil.

    Potential for inoculation of common bean by effective rhizobia in Tunisian soils · 1997

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Selected endophytic bacteria had no negative effects on bean growth performance in the greenhouse.

    Application of endophytic bacteria for controlling anthracnose disease ( Colletotrichum lindemuthianum ) on bean plants · 2013

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Rhizobia inoculation had no effect on bean shoot dry weight, nodule dry weight or shoot nitrogen content.

    EFFECTIVENESS OF RHIZOBIA ISOLATES FROM NJORO SOILS (KENYA) AND COMMERCIAL INOCULANTS IN NODULATION OF COMMON BEANS (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS) · 2011

    Opposite direction

117 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.