Paper · 1997 · Agronomie

Potential for inoculation of common bean by effective rhizobia in Tunisian soils

M. E. Aouani; R. Mhamdi; M. Mars; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Phaseolus vulgaris (L) is poorly nodulated in all the regions of Tunisia where this crop is grown.Selection of effective strains needs to be developed.An effectiveness test trial was carried out on Royalnel and Coco cultivars in hydroponic aseptic conditions for seven reference strains and three local isolates of common bean rhizobia.A significant interaction strain × cultivar was observed and, unlike local isolates, most reference strains were very effective.The ELISA technique using polyclonal antibody was used to evaluate nodule occupancy of inoculated common bean rhi- zobia in Tunisian soils.Rabbit antisera were raised against one local isolate (HB) and five reference strains (CIAT899, USDA2667, USDA2669, USDA2676 and IRATYH112).Analysis of relatedness between 44 strains and isolates showed that 77% of the local isolates did not react with any of the sera used, whereas the remaining isolates were dis- tributed into three serogroups.An inoculation experiment with the selected reference strains CIAT899, USDA2667 and IRATYH112, which are serologically distinguishable from native rhizobia, was performed in a green house for Royalnel and Coco cultivars grown in soil cores from two sites (Boucharraï and Chrifet).Nodule occupancy of the inoc- ulated strains was assessed and concomitant effect of inoculation on nodule number and shoot nitrogen content was analysed.A highly significant treatment x cultivar x site interaction was observed for the parameters studied.While in Boucharraï soil inoculation leads to a significant improvement of shoot nitrogen content for Royalnel cultivar, inocu- lation of the same cultivar in Chrifet soil leads to an increase in nodulation by native rhizobia without improvement of plant growth.For the two cultivars, N-fertilization leads for the two cultivars to a decrease in nodule number, particularly in Chrifet soil.Thus, to improve establishment of symbiotic process, the use of N-fertilizer should be rationalized.inoculation / rhizobia / Phaseolus vulgaris / ELISA Résumé -Faisabilité d'inoculation du haricot par des Rhizobium efficients en sols tunisiens.Le haricot (Phaseolus *Correspondence and reprints et Chrifet).Le pourcentage de nodosités formés par les souches inoculées a été estimé et l'effet de l'inoculation sur le nombre de nodules et l'azote dans les parties aériennes ont été analysés.Une interaction hautement significative traite- ment x cultivar x site a été observée pour les paramètres étudiés.Alors que sur le sol de Boucharraï l'inoculation conduit à une amélioration significative du contenu en azote des parties aériennes pour le cultivar Royalnel, l'inocula- tion du même cultivar sur sol de Chrifet conduit plutôt à une stimulation de la nodulation par les bactéries natives sans amélioration de la croissance végétale.L'application d'engrais azoté conduit pour les deux cultivars à une diminution de la nodulation particulièrement sur sol de Chrifet.En vue de favoriser l'établissement du processus symbiotique, l'uti- lisation de ce composé doit être rationalisée.inoculation / Rhizobium / Phaseolus vulgaris / Elisa

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain effectiveness depended significantly on cultivar.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
interaction strain × cultivare0

Not reportedMaterialDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant interaction strain × cultivar was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–392 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most reference strains were highly effective compared with local isolates.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
most reference strains were very effectivee0
Comparator
local isolatese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“unlike local isolates, most reference strains were very effective.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seventy-seven percent of local isolates failed to react with the tested sera.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
local isolates did not react with any of the sera usede0
Value
77%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“77% of the local isolates did not react with any of the sera used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The remaining isolates fell into three serogroups.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
remaining isolates were dis- tributed into three serogroupse0
Value
three serogroupse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the remaining isolates were dis- tributed into three serogroups.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–950 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment, cultivar, and site interacted significantly for studied nodulation and nitrogen measures.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
treatment x cultivar x site interactione0
Setting
sitee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A highly significant treatment x cultivar x site interaction was observed for the parameters studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1484 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased Royalnel shoot nitrogen in Boucharraï soil.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Material
Royalnel cultivare0
Treatment
inoculatione0
Outcome
shoot nitrogen contente0
Direction
improvemente0
Setting
Boucharraï soile0

Not reportedInteractorComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Boucharraï soil inoculation leads to a significant improvement of shoot nitrogen content for Royalnel cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1490–1603 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased native-rhizobial nodulation of Royalnel in Chrifet soil.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Interactor
native rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation by native rhizobiae0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
Chrifet soile0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inocu- lation of the same cultivar in Chrifet soil leads to an increase in nodulation by native rhizobia without improvement of plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation leads to a significant improvement of shoot nitrogen content for Royalnel cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation did not improve Royalnel plant growth in Chrifet soil.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
inoculatione1
Interactor
native rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
without improvemente0
Setting
Chrifet soile0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inocu- lation of the same cultivar in Chrifet soil leads to an increase in nodulation by native rhizobia without improvement of plant growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1746 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculation leads to a significant improvement of shoot nitrogen content for Royalnel cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization decreased nodule number in both cultivars, especially in Chrifet soil.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
N-fertilizatione0
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
Chrifet soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For the two cultivars, N-fertilization leads for the two cultivars to a decrease in nodule number, particularly in Chrifet soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1746–1874 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend rationalizing nitrogen fertilizer use to improve symbiosis.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Outcome
the use of N-fertilizer should be rationalizede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“to improve establishment of symbiotic process, the use of N-fertilizer should be rationalized.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1880–1974 · show in text ↑
t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–40 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

31 papers: 9 positive, 22 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

126 papers: 106 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 106 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

122 papers more in this group

See all 126 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

90 papers: 83 positive, 7 negative or no effect

82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.