Recommendationmodel-written summary

The authors concluded that 3×3 m poplar spacing was more economic than other spacings.

A claim from Agroforestry: Viable alternatives for ensuring green fodder production around the year · 2022

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that 3×3 m poplar spacing was more economic than other spacings.

Taxon
poplarPopuluse0
Outcome
closer spacing of 3×3 m of poplar is more economic than the other spacingse0
Qualifier
more number of trees per unit area and more production of woode0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Populus
Populus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“closer spacing of 3×3 m of poplar is more economic than the other spacings due to more number of trees per unit area and more production of wood”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1670

Title

Agroforestry: Viable alternatives for ensuring green fodder production around the year

Sneh Yadav; R. S. Dhillon; K.S. Ahlawat; et al. Environment Conservation Journal 2022. doi:10.36953/ecj.021897-2159

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-e7dacd8eeed782e7d3284a65139ee45ff5fc555eb66b2d282281a8c5836672e1 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer