Claim · model-written summary
After 13 inductive cycles, flowering time was no longer influenced by photoperiod.
- Taxon
- Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.)
Papaver somniferumt0 - Treatment
- PPe4
- Outcome
- flowering timee4
- Direction
- no longer influencede4
- Qualifier
- After 13 inductive cyclese4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.)”
e4“After 13 inductive cycles, flowering time was no longer influenced by PP”
Title
Photoperiod Sensitivity during Flower Development of Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.)
Z. Wang; M.C. Acock; B. Acock HortScience 1996. doi:10.21273/hortsci.31.4.681d
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation Poppy plants showed developmental changes in response to photoperiod four days after emergence.
- Observation A minimum of four inductive cycles was required before the poppy plant flowered.
- Intervention effect Additional inductive cycles, up to a maximum of nine, hastened flowering.
- Observation Flower development in opium poppy has four phases between emergence and first flower.
- Observation The juvenile phase (JP) lasted a minimum of 4 days under the conditions of the experiment.
- Observation The photoperiod-sensitive inductive phase (PSP) lasted a minimum of 4 days under the conditions of the experiment.
- Observation The photoperiod-sensitive post-inductive phase (PSPP) lasted a minimum of 9 days under the conditions of the experiment.
- Observation The photoperiod-insensitive post-inductive phase (PIPP) lasted a minimum of 14 days under the conditions of the experiment.