Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pyrimethanil was not so effective against powdery mildew on apple trees.

A claim from Effectiveness of fluquiconazole and pyrimethanil in control of apple scab and powdery mildew · 1995

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyrimethanil was not so effective against powdery mildew on apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Material
McIntoshe0
Treatment
pyrimethanile2
Interactor
powdery mildewe2pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe2
Direction
not so effectivee2

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Effectiveness of two new fungicides - fluquiconazole and pyrimethanil - in control of apple scab and powdery mildew on apple trees cv. McIntosh was evaluated in 1992-94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–168
e2

“pyrimethanil from anilino pyrimidines group, an active ingedient of Mynthos 300 SC, provided very good control of apple scab but was not so effective against powdery mildew”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–577

Title

Effectiveness of fluquiconazole and pyrimethanil in control of apple scab and powdery mildew

H. Nowacka Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 1995

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e7e2fcf63777a49ce1121af0417c05f5e59f21f82c35da1efed5dc2166c64f5d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

pyrimethanil · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.