Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Bacterial glucokinase expression in the invertase background decreased tuber starch content.

A claim from Evidence that SNF1‐related kinase and hexokinase are involved in separate sugar‐signalling pathways modulating post‐translational redox activation of ADP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase in potato tubers · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial glucokinase expression in the invertase background decreased tuber starch content.

Treatment
Expression of a bacterial glucokinasee0
Outcome
tuber starch contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
invertase-expressing backgrounde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“potato tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 183–196
e0

“Expression of a bacterial glucokinase in the invertase-expressing background led to a decrease in AGPase activation state and tuber starch content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1956–2103

Title

Evidence that SNF1‐related kinase and hexokinase are involved in separate sugar‐signalling pathways modulating post‐translational redox activation of ADP‐glucose pyrophosphorylase in potato tubers

Axel Tiessen; Katrin Prescha; Anja Branscheid; et al. The Plant Journal 2003. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01823.x

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e7e57e4e2f728f7fc9d63764d7a87377e447a4174c2e67cb6437be2290aed4ab · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

transgenic · quality: sugar starch · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.