Intervention effectmodel-written summary

BBF planting increased soybean seed yield by 11.60 per cent over conventional sowing.

A claim from Impact of frontline demonstrations of Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) on yield and economics of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) under Rainfed conditions of Northern Telangana Zone, India · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BBF planting increased soybean seed yield by 11.60 per cent over conventional sowing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
BBF methode0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
yield increasee0
Value
11.60 per cente0
Qualifier
2090 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
conventional method of sowinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sowing of soybean with BBF method found to be superior in seed yield and average soybean productivity with BBF planter was 2090 kg ha-1, with a yield increase of 11.60 per cent over conventional method of sowing (1873 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–632

Title

Impact of frontline demonstrations of Broad Bed Furrow (BBF) on yield and economics of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) under Rainfed conditions of Northern Telangana Zone, India

Raghuveer M.; G. Shiva Charan; Y. Praveen Kumar; et al. Ecology Environment and Conservation 2022. doi:10.53550/eec.2022.v28i02.019

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e7e6cf5560439cdf381951422eaa6abe47353ec31e01d5cd077e00b00323bb3e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

343 papers: 264 positive, 79 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this claim · 72 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

334 papers more in this group

See all 343 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.