Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Protein content of lentil remained relatively unchanged with soaking.

A claim from Effects of soaking duration on nutritional composition and total phenolic content of some selected lentil varieties of Bangladesh · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content of lentil remained relatively unchanged with soaking.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
soakinge2
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
remained relatively unchangede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lentil varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–115
e2

“Results showed that soaking significantly increased moisture (0.4%~1.3%) and crude fiber content (0.7%~0.9%) and reduced total carbohydrates (0.2%~1.6%), crude lipid (0.4%~1.2%) and ash content (0.3%~0.6%) at 18 hrs soaking period in all the tested varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–1010
e4

“Additionally, protein content remained relatively unchanged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1193

Title

Effects of soaking duration on nutritional composition and total phenolic content of some selected lentil varieties of Bangladesh

Riya Sarkar; Most. Khadiza Khatun; Mst. Adia Sultana; et al. Probe-Plant & animal sciences. 2024. doi:10.18686/ppas.v6i1.2283

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e7eb78925f31ba550bfc6c52dffeca4e0fc429f6ddc14cb5132340521d815690 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

application · quality: protein · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.