Claim · model-written summary
The four cultivars differed in drought perception and antioxidant defense.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Outcome
- different perception and antioxidant defense systemse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“four tomato cultivars had different perception and antioxidant defense systems against drought stress”
Title
Müge Teker Yıldız; Cüneyt Akı Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15030653
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect Drought reduced root and shoot lengths, chlorophyll, water content, biomass and antioxidant enzyme activity in Falcon.
- Intervention effect Drought reduced the same physiological and enzyme responses in H−2274.
- Intervention effect Drought increased TBARs and H2O2 in Falcon and H−2274.
- Intervention effect Falcon shoot length fell 21% under PEG and 37% under water scarcity versus control.
- Intervention effect Falcon relative water content fell 20% under PEG and 30% under water scarcity.
- Intervention effect Falcon chlorophyll content fell 7% under PEG and 23% under water scarcity.
- Intervention effect Falcon fresh weight fell 51% under PEG and 49% under water scarcity.
- Intervention effect Falcon dry weight fell 9% under PEG and 29% under water scarcity.
- Intervention effect Falcon TBARs increased 2% under PEG and 14% under water scarcity.
- Intervention effect Falcon H2O2 content increased 3% under PEG and 15% under water scarcity.
- Intervention effect Rio Grande relative water content decreased 1% under PEG and 3% under water scarcity.
- Intervention effect Rio Grande total chlorophyll content increased 6%.
- Intervention effect Rio Grande CAT activity was intense, at 50% and 67%, under the two drought treatments.
- Intervention effect Rio Grande SOD activity increased 30%.
- Intervention effect Rio Grande lipid peroxidation decreased 5% under PEG and 22% under water scarcity.
- Intervention effect Rio Grande H2O2 content decreased 11% under PEG and 15% under water scarcity.
- Recommendation Rio Grande was judged drought resistant and suitable for water-scarce areas.
- Observation Falcon was judged susceptible to drought.
- Observation Reported drought tolerance ranked Rio Grande highest and Falcon lowest.