Claim · model-written summary
SRI gave the highest return, 2.28.
Oryza sativaNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field experiments were conducted during wet seasons of 2009 and 2010 to evaluate three rice crop establishment methods viz. system of rice intensification (SRI), drum seeding (DS) and conventional transplanting (CT)”
e4“The highest gross return (` 77925 ha-1), net return (` 43033 ha-1) and return ` (2.28) were obtained from SRI”
Title
Tushar Ranjan Mohanty; Swapan Kumar Maity; Pravat Kumar Roul; et al. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2023
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect SRI gave significantly higher leaf area index, dry matter accumulation and root dry weight than DS and CT.
- Intervention effect SRI gave significantly higher root volume than DS and CT.
- Intervention effect SRI gave 18% higher grain yield than CT.
- Intervention effect SRI gave 26% higher grain yield than DS.
- Intervention effect SRI with INM gave the highest grain yield, 6435 kg/ha.
- Intervention effect INM gave 11.9% higher grain yield than RDF.
- Intervention effect INM gave 19.2% higher grain yield than OM.
- Association SRI gave the highest gross return, 77925 ha-1.
- Association SRI gave the highest net return, 43033 ha-1.
- Association SRI gave the highest energy output, energy productivity and energy ratio.
- Association CT and DS gave statistically comparable energy indices.
- Association SRI with INM gave the highest productivity, 7299 kg/ha.
- Association SRI with INM gave the highest gross return, 85216 ha-1.
- Association SRI with INM gave the highest net return, 50274 ha-1.
- Association SRI with INM gave the highest energy productivity, 644.2 kg-1 MJ×103 ha-1.