View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Crop geometry 45×10 gave the highest gross return , net return and net return per rupee investment.
Outcomegross return, net return and net return per rupee investment e6 Verbatim
t0 “Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 e6 “Crop geometry was recorded highest gross return , net return and net return per rupee investment in 45×10 and lowest in 45×30 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1535 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
T3 had the highest gross return , net return and BCR.
Outcomegross return, net return and BCR e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the highest gross return , net return and BCR were recorded in the T3 treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1988 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize-cowpea intercropping gave similar gross return , net return and return per rupee invested under conventional and minimum tillage.
Treatmentconventional tillage e0 Outcomegross return, net return and return per rupee invested e0 Comparatorminimum tillage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The gross return , net return and return per rupee invested from maize+cowpea intercropping either under conventional tillage or under minimum tillage were similar ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1440 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Kobresia leaf structural cost and photosynthetic return shifted from high-input-slow- return to low-input-fast- return .
Outcomestructural cost and photosynthetic efficiency return e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “the structural cost and photosynthetic efficiency return of Kobresia tibetica leaves changed from 'high-input-slow return ' to 'low-input-fast return ' ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1718 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Barley recorded the highest gross return , net return and average rate of return compared with wheat over all seasons.
Outcomegross return (GR), net return (NR) and average rate of return (ARR) e4 Directionthe highest values e4 Settingoverall seasons of this study e4 Verbatim
e4 “barley recorded the highest values of gross return (GR), net return (NR) and average rate of return (ARR) than wheat overall seasons of this study ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1329 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Gross return , net return and net return per rupee investment were higher for RSC 1046 than for CG Soya 1.
Outcomegross return, net return and net return per rupee investment e5 Verbatim
t0 “Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 e5 “There was gross return , net return and net return per rupee investment higher in variety RSC 1046 and lowest in CG Soya 1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1409 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Paparri produced higher gross return , net return and benefit cost ratio.
Outcomegross return, net return and benefit cost ratio e0 Verbatim
e0 “significantly higher gross return , net return and benefit cost ratio was recorded from Paparri variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–998 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
RDF+WL maximized gross return , net return and benefit-cost ratio.
OutcomeGross return, net return, benefit: cost ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Gross return , net return , benefit: cost ratio was highest in RDF+WL. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2345–2413 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect RDF improved tiller density, shoot emergence ratio, height and dry matter, at par with SSNM-7 and SSNM-8. Intervention effect RDF minimized lodging angle, lodged area and lodging score. Intervention effect RDF maximized grain yield, harvest index and financial returns. Intervention effect RDF maximized grain nitrogen and phosphorus uptake, while SSNM-8 maximized potassium uptake. Intervention effect Nutrient doses above RDF favoured lodging. Intervention effect GR2 increased emergence and tiller density and reduced mortality. Intervention effect GR2 increased dry matter, leaf area index and thousand-grain weight. Intervention effect GR1 minimized height and internode length and had higher grain yield and harvest index. Intervention effect RDF with GR1 lowered lodging angle, lodged area and score. Intervention effect RDF with GR2 increased thousand-grain weight. Intervention effect RDF with GR1 maximized grain yield and harvest index. Intervention effect Experiment 2 treatments did not affect tiller density, shoot emergence ratio or height. Intervention effect RDF+WL maximized dry matter, leaf area index, peduncle and internode length and time to maturity. Intervention effect RDF plus nano-silicon minimized lodging angle, lodged area and score. Intervention effect RDF+WL maximized thousand-grain weight, at par with RDF+IL plus nanosilicon. Intervention effect RDF+WL maximized grain, biological and straw yield and harvest index. Intervention effect Ethrel, KC1 and nano-silicon improved recovery from induced lodging, with nano-silicon most effective. Intervention effect Chemical recovery was incomplete and yield remained much lower than RDF+WL. Recommendation The authors recommend RDF with cycocel to minimize wheat lodging and increase grain yield. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Gross return , net return and B:C ratio were higher with the treatment.
Treatmentthis treatment e0 Outcomegross return, net return and B:C ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Further the gross return , net return and B:C ratio were also higher with this treatment. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1451 t0 “rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Two-year straw return gave significantly higher yield than one-year return .
Treatment2-year of straw return e0 Comparator1-year of straw return e0 Not reported Taxon Outcome
Verbatim
e0 “2-year of straw return was significantly higher than 1-year of straw return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–599 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.