Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop geometry 45×10 gave the highest gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
45×10e6
Outcome
gross return, net return and net return per rupee investmente6
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
45×30e6

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56
e6

“Crop geometry was recorded highest gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment in 45×10 and lowest in 45×30”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1535

Title

Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation and feasibility of economics

Chandraprakash Verma; Vivek Kumar Tripathi; Lok Prakash Verma; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i3x.9451

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T3 had the highest gross return, net return and BCR.

Treatment
T3 treatmente0
Outcome
gross return, net return and BCRe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the highest gross return, net return and BCR were recorded in the T3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1988

Title

Integrated Nutrient Management Improves Productivity and Quality of Sugarcane (Saccharum Officinarum L.)

Md. Shamsul Arefin; Md. Ariful Islam; Md. Mokhlesur Rahman; et al. Phyton 2021. doi:10.32604/phyton.2022.017359

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize-cowpea intercropping gave similar gross return, net return and return per rupee invested under conventional and minimum tillage.

Taxon
maize+cowpeae0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
gross return, net return and return per rupee investede0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
minimum tillagee0

Verbatim

e0

“The gross return, net return and return per rupee invested from maize+cowpea intercropping either under conventional tillage or under minimum tillage were similar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1440

Title

Influence of maize-based conservation agricultural practices (CAPs) on productivity, profitability and soil fertility in rain-fed uplands of Odisha

Pravat Kumar Roul; Pravat Kumar Ray; K.N. Mishra; et al. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) 2012

Other claims from this paper (10)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kobresia leaf structural cost and photosynthetic return shifted from high-input-slow-return to low-input-fast-return.

Taxon
Kobresia tibeticaCarex tibetikobresiae0
Outcome
structural cost and photosynthetic efficiency returne0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the structural cost and photosynthetic efficiency return of Kobresia tibetica leaves changed from 'high-input-slow return' to 'low-input-fast return'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1718

Title

Stem-leaf tradeoff of Kobresia tibetica in alpine peat swamp study on the relationship of water use efficiency

Xinyue Zhang; Xiawei Zhao; Chengzhang Zhao; et al. Functional Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1071/fp25142

Other claims from this paper (11)
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley recorded the highest gross return, net return and average rate of return compared with wheat over all seasons.

Outcome
gross return (GR), net return (NR) and average rate of return (ARR)e4
Direction
the highest valuese4
Comparator
wheate4
Setting
overall seasons of this studye4

Verbatim

e4

“barley recorded the highest values of gross return (GR), net return (NR) and average rate of return (ARR) than wheat overall seasons of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1329

Title

EFFECT OF TILLAGE SYSTEMS ON WINTER CEREALS PRODUCTIVITY UNDER RAINFED CONDITIONS AT RAS EL-HEKMA, EGYPT

Naem Moselhy Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 2010. doi:10.21608/zjar.2010.317691

Other claims from this paper (8)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment were higher for RSC 1046 than for CG Soya 1.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material
RSC 1046e5
Treatment
varietye5
Outcome
gross return, net return and net return per rupee investmente5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
CG Soya 1e5

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56
e5

“There was gross return, net return and net return per rupee investment higher in variety RSC 1046 and lowest in CG Soya 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1288–1409

Title

Effect of ridge and furrow system in soybean cultivation and feasibility of economics

Chandraprakash Verma; Vivek Kumar Tripathi; Lok Prakash Verma; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i3x.9451

Other claims from this paper (11)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paparri produced higher gross return, net return and benefit cost ratio.

Taxon
Paparri varietye0
Material
Paparrie0
Outcome
gross return, net return and benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“significantly higher gross return, net return and benefit cost ratio was recorded from Paparri variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–998

Title

Effects of phosphorus application on bunch and spreading genotypes of groundnut

Rahmatullah Nazir; Sayed Ahmad Sayedi; Khalilullah Zaryal; et al. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology 2022. doi:10.58628/jae-2214-24

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RDF+WL maximized gross return, net return and benefit-cost ratio.

Treatment
RDF+WLe0
Outcome
Gross return, net return, benefit: cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Gross return, net return, benefit: cost ratio was highest in RDF+WL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2345–2413
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–57

Title

Studies on agro-chemicals for lodging management in wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) for higher productivity

PANKAJ PRAJAPAT; RAMESH CHOUDHARY; BHANWAR LAL JAT ASIAN JOURNAL OF BIO SCIENCE 2017. doi:10.15740/has/ajbs/12.2/134-155

Other claims from this paper (19)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross return, net return and B:C ratio were higher with the treatment.

Treatment
this treatmente0
Outcome
gross return, net return and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Further the gross return, net return and B:C ratio were also higher with this treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1451
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–60

Title

Labour-saving weed management practices in transplanted rice

Radhakrishna Sureshkumar; S. Durairaj International Journal of Chemical Studies 2018

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-year straw return gave significantly higher yield than one-year return.

Treatment
2-year of straw returne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
1-year of straw returne0

Not reportedTaxonOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“2-year of straw return was significantly higher than 1-year of straw return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–599

Title

Effects of Rice-Straw Return to Field on Nitrogen Accumulation and Yield of Rice under the Nitrogen Manipulation and Biological Decomposing

Yuanyuan Zhang; Li Jianlin; Wang Chunhong; et al. T'u Jang T'ung Pao 2012

Other claims from this paper (7)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.