Paper · 2012 · T'u Jang T'ung Pao

Effects of Rice-Straw Return to Field on Nitrogen Accumulation and Yield of Rice under the Nitrogen Manipulation and Biological Decomposing

Yuanyuan Zhang; Li Jianlin; Wang Chunhong; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out to study how nitrogen accumulation and yield of rice straw were affected by the measure of rice straw return to field under the application of nitrogen and biological decomposing agents.The results showed that rice straw could improve nitrogen accumulation of rice ear obviously.Compared with CK,both the total nitrogen accumulation and grain nitrogen accumulation were higher in the treatment of 2-year rice straw return.Different treatment levels also obviously impacted the rice yield: 2-year of straw return was significantly higher than 1-year of straw return,high-N treatment was significantly higher than the low one,and treatments with biological decomposing agents were better than those without.Of all the above treatments,the rice yield was highest in the treatment of 2-year straw return + high nitrogen + biological decomposing agents.Therefore,we concluded that this treatment was the best measure for rice straw return to field in northeastern China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw improved rice ear nitrogen accumulation.

Treatment
rice strawe0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation of rice eare0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rice straw could improve nitrogen accumulation of rice ear obviously”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-year straw return raised total nitrogen accumulation over CK.

Treatment
2-year rice straw returne0
Outcome
total nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,both the total nitrogen accumulation and grain nitrogen accumulation were higher in the treatment of 2-year rice straw return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-year straw return raised grain nitrogen accumulation over CK.

Treatment
2-year rice straw returne0
Outcome
grain nitrogen accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK,both the total nitrogen accumulation and grain nitrogen accumulation were higher in the treatment of 2-year rice straw return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-year straw return gave significantly higher yield than one-year return.

Treatment
2-year of straw returne0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
1-year of straw returne0

Not reportedTaxonOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“2-year of straw return was significantly higher than 1-year of straw return”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High nitrogen gave significantly higher yield than low nitrogen.

Treatment
high-N treatmente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the low onee0

Not reportedTaxonOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“high-N treatment was significantly higher than the low one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–658 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological decomposing agents gave better yield than their absence.

Treatment
biological decomposing agentse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
those withoute0

Not reportedTaxonOutcome

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with biological decomposing agents were better than those without”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–739 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination of two-year straw return, high nitrogen and decomposing agents gave the highest rice yield.

Treatment
2-year straw return + high nitrogen + biological decomposing agentse0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rice yield was highest in the treatment of 2-year straw return + high nitrogen + biological decomposing agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–882 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors judged that combination the best straw return practice in northeastern China.

Outcome
best measure for rice straw return to fielde0
Setting
northeastern Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this treatment was the best measure for rice straw return to field in northeastern China”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–999 · show in text ↑

organic · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 96 positive, 10 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

323 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.