Claim · model-written summary
Forage production was greater in bluegrass pasture than mixed grass prairie.
- Taxon
- Leafy spurge
Euphorbia esulat0 - Outcome
- forage productione0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- mixed grass prairie sitee0
- Setting
- bluegrass pasture sitee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“forage production was greater at the bluegrass pasture site than the mixed grass prairie site”
t0“Leafy Spurge”
Title
Rodney G. Lym; Calvin G. Messersmith Weed Technology 1994. doi:10.1017/s0890037x0002875x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Annual dicamba produced at least 85% leafy spurge control after three years.
- Intervention effect Annual picloram produced at least 85% leafy spurge control after three years.
- Intervention effect Glyphosate plus 2,4-D applied annually or rotated gave at least 90% control in bluegrass pasture.
- Observation Control in mixed grass prairie was 50% or less.
- Intervention effect Glyphosate plus 2,4-D severely reduced forage production in mixed grass prairie.
- Observation All bluegrass pasture treatments yielded an average positive economic return of $227/ha.
- Observation Picloram treatments in mixed grass prairie returned $285/ha on average.
- Observation Rotations including glyphosate plus 2,4-D had an average $32/ha loss.