Paper · 1994 · Weed Technology

Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Control, Forage Production, and Economic Return with Fall-Applied Herbicides

Rodney G. Lym; Calvin G. Messersmith

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Leafy spurge control and forage production after various fall-applied herbicide treatment rotations were evaluated in a bluegrass pasture and a mixed grass prairie. Dicamba at 2 kg ae/ha or picloram at 0.6 kg ae/ha alone or combined with 2,4-D at 1 kg ae/ha applied annually for 3 yr provided consistent leafy spurge control of 85% or better, but forage production was greater at the bluegrass pasture site than the mixed grass prairie site. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D at 0.4 plus 0.7 kg ae/ha applied annually or rotated with picloram plus 2,4-D or dicamba provided 90% or better leafy spurge control after 3 yr at the bluegrass pasture. Control was 50% or less at the mixed grass prairie site where forage production was severely reduced by glyphosate plus 2,4-D. All treatments on the bluegrass pasture provided a positive economic return averaging $227/ha after 3 yr. Picloram or picloram plus 2,4-D at the mixed grass prairie site provided net returns averaging $285/ha, but treatment rotations that included glyphosate plus 2,4-D one or more times in 3 yr averaged a net loss of $32/ha due to severe grass injury.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual dicamba produced at least 85% leafy spurge control after three years.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulat0
Treatment
Dicamba at 2 kg ae/hae0
Outcome
leafy spurge controle0
Direction
85% or bettere0
Value
85% or bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba at 2 kg ae/ha or picloram at 0.6 kg ae/ha alone or combined with 2,4-D at 1 kg ae/ha applied annually for 3 yr provided consistent leafy spurge control of 85% or better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Spurge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual picloram produced at least 85% leafy spurge control after three years.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulat0
Treatment
picloram at 0.6 kg ae/hae0
Outcome
leafy spurge controle0
Direction
85% or bettere0
Value
85% or bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba at 2 kg ae/ha or picloram at 0.6 kg ae/ha alone or combined with 2,4-D at 1 kg ae/ha applied annually for 3 yr provided consistent leafy spurge control of 85% or better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 165–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Spurge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage production was greater in bluegrass pasture than mixed grass prairie.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulat0
Outcome
forage productione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
mixed grass prairie sitee0
Setting
bluegrass pasture sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“forage production was greater at the bluegrass pasture site than the mixed grass prairie site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 347–440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Spurge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus 2,4-D applied annually or rotated gave at least 90% control in bluegrass pasture.

Taxon
leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulae0
Treatment
Glyphosate plus 2,4-D at 0.4 plus 0.7 kg ae/hae0
Outcome
leafy spurge controle0
Direction
90% or bettere0
Value
90% or bettere0
Setting
bluegrass pasturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate plus 2,4-D at 0.4 plus 0.7 kg ae/ha applied annually or rotated with picloram plus 2,4-D or dicamba provided 90% or better leafy spurge control after 3 yr at the bluegrass pasture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–632 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control in mixed grass prairie was 50% or less.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulat0
Outcome
Controle0
Direction
50% or lesse0
Value
50% or lesse0
Setting
mixed grass prairie sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Control was 50% or less at the mixed grass prairie site where forage production was severely reduced by glyphosate plus 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Spurge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate plus 2,4-D severely reduced forage production in mixed grass prairie.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulat0
Treatment
glyphosate plus 2,4-De0
Outcome
forage productione0
Direction
severely reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“forage production was severely reduced by glyphosate plus 2,4-D”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–759 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Spurge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All bluegrass pasture treatments yielded an average positive economic return of $227/ha.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulat0
Outcome
economic returne0
Direction
positivee0
Value
$227/hae0
Setting
bluegrass pasturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All treatments on the bluegrass pasture provided a positive economic return averaging $227/ha after 3 yr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Spurge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picloram treatments in mixed grass prairie returned $285/ha on average.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulat0
Treatment
Picloram or picloram plus 2,4-De0
Outcome
net returnse0
Value
$285/hae0
Setting
mixed grass prairie sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Picloram or picloram plus 2,4-D at the mixed grass prairie site provided net returns averaging $285/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Spurge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rotations including glyphosate plus 2,4-D had an average $32/ha loss.

Taxon
Leafy spurgeEuphorbia esulat0
Treatment
glyphosate plus 2,4-De0
Outcome
net losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
$32/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Euphorbia esula
Euphorbia esula · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment rotations that included glyphosate plus 2,4-D one or more times in 3 yr averaged a net loss of $32/ha due to severe grass injury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leafy Spurge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–12 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · yield · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

2,4-D · control · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

dicamba · control · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

glyphosate · control · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

picloram · control · Euphorbia esula (leafy spurge)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.