Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sustained 100% defoliation three times delayed cotton maturity by a peak of 10 d.

A claim from How to Succeed by Doing Nothing · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sustained 100% defoliation three times delayed cotton maturity by a peak of 10 d.

Treatment
100% defoliation three timese2
Outcome
Crop maturitye2
Direction
delaye2
Value
10 de2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 270–301
e2

“Crop maturity was affected by sustained high levels of leaf loss with a peak delay of 10 d after 100% defoliation three times”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–869

Title

How to Succeed by Doing Nothing

Lewis J. Wilson; Victor O. Sadras; Simone C. Heimoana; et al. Crop Science 2003. doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.2125

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e82a1a49f12331eb125015da77144c81cc87edcb38eed155a04d00996b6d18fb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

pruning · phenology · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.