Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The W5 treatment increased WP by 21.9%–24.8% compared with the W6 treatment.

A claim from Effects of intercropping and regulated deficit irrigation on the yield, water and land resource utilization, and economic benefits of forage maize in arid region of Northwest China · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The W5 treatment increased WP by 21.9%–24.8% compared with the W6 treatment.

Taxon
forage maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayse0
Treatment
W5 treatmente2
Outcome
WPe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
21.9%–24.8%e2
Comparator
W6 treatmente2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three planting modes, including forage maize (Zea mays L.) monoculture (M), lablab bean (Lablab purpureus L.) monoculture (L), and maize-lablab bean intercropping (ML) were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–608
e2

“The W5 treatment achieved similar fresh forage yield, hay yield, and crude protein yield as that of the W6 treatment but reduced irrigation water by 25% and increased the WP (21.9%–24.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1232

Title

Effects of intercropping and regulated deficit irrigation on the yield, water and land resource utilization, and economic benefits of forage maize in arid region of Northwest China

Maojian Wang; Wei Shi; Muhammad Kamran; et al. Agricultural Water Management 2024. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108876

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e862e7ef857f75dc8291aca96c40053f606729e37556804bf7cba6608566c6c5 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer