Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Substrate Ⅴ raised whole plant of weight by 81.01% versus control.

A claim from Effect of different substrates on the growth of container steckling of Camellia oleifera · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Substrate Ⅴ raised whole plant of weight by 81.01% versus control.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
substrate Ⅴe0
Outcome
whole plant of weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
81.01%e0
Comparator
CGe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the planting survival rate of the substrate Ⅲ,Ⅶ,were 20%,16% respectively higher than the control group(CG);the substrate Ⅵ and Ⅴ had significant effects on the growth of the cuttings,such as the number of leaves,which were 84.21% and 78.95% higher than CG;the height were 56.34% and 20.03% higher than CG;the growth of aboveground weight were 94.59%,54.05% respectively higher than CG and the whole plant of weight were121.52% and 81.01% higher than CG;underground weight of substrate Ⅲ and Ⅷ were 193.75% and 118.75% respectively higher than CG;the length of main root of substrate Ⅶ was153.44% higher than CG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–874
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–88

Title

Effect of different substrates on the growth of container steckling of Camellia oleifera

Shu Qing-long China Forestry Science and Technology 2011

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-e87ea87fea2da25c5ee249f0a52d2b92569362a26c774ea73d8a7d40e77bd49e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer