Claim · model-written summary
Substrate Ⅴ raised whole plant of weight by 81.01% versus control.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleiferat0 - Treatment
- substrate Ⅴe0
- Outcome
- whole plant of weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 81.01%e0
- Comparator
- CGe0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the planting survival rate of the substrate Ⅲ,Ⅶ,were 20%,16% respectively higher than the control group(CG);the substrate Ⅵ and Ⅴ had significant effects on the growth of the cuttings,such as the number of leaves,which were 84.21% and 78.95% higher than CG;the height were 56.34% and 20.03% higher than CG;the growth of aboveground weight were 94.59%,54.05% respectively higher than CG and the whole plant of weight were121.52% and 81.01% higher than CG;underground weight of substrate Ⅲ and Ⅷ were 193.75% and 118.75% respectively higher than CG;the length of main root of substrate Ⅶ was153.44% higher than CG”
t0“Camellia oleifera”
Title
Effect of different substrates on the growth of container steckling of Camellia oleifera
Shu Qing-long China Forestry Science and Technology 2011
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅲ raised planting survival rate by 20% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅶ raised planting survival rate by 16% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅵ raised number of leaves by 84.21% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅴ raised number of leaves by 78.95% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅵ raised height by 56.34% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅴ raised height by 20.03% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅵ raised aboveground weight by 94.59% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅴ raised aboveground weight by 54.05% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅵ raised whole plant of weight by 121.52% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅲ raised underground weight by 193.75% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅷ raised underground weight by 118.75% versus control.
- Intervention effect Substrate Ⅶ raised length of main root by 153.44% versus control.