Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 19:19:19 spray produced haulm yield of 38.0 q ha-1, statistically at par with calcium nitrate.

A claim from Enhancing Kharif Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Yield and Quality through Foliar Nutrition · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 19:19:19 spray produced haulm yield of 38.0 q ha-1, statistically at par with calcium nitrate.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
foliar spray of 2 % 19:19:19e0
Outcome
haulm yieldse0e1
Direction
higheste0
Value
38.0 q ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at par with the corresponding highest yields (29.9, 20.40 and 38.0 q ha-1, respectively) were recorded with foliar spray of 2 % 19:19:19”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1058
e1

“highest dry pod, kernel and haulm yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–801
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26

Title

Enhancing Kharif Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Yield and Quality through Foliar Nutrition

S.A. Shete; A.V. Bulbule; D.S. Patil; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.131

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-e898fa4c93f04c7212edbb5db2a342b62ebb8d2e9ba97390d592f1b3d562079a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.