Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 19:19:19 spray gave oil yield of 924 kg ha-1, at par with calcium nitrate.

A claim from Enhancing Kharif Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Yield and Quality through Foliar Nutrition · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 19:19:19 spray gave oil yield of 924 kg ha-1, at par with calcium nitrate.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
2 % 19:19:19 spraye0
Outcome
oil yielde0e1
Value
924 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at par with 2 % 19:19:19 spray (924 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1287
e1

“highest oil yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1188
t0

“Groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–26

Title

Enhancing Kharif Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Yield and Quality through Foliar Nutrition

S.A. Shete; A.V. Bulbule; D.S. Patil; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.710.131

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-ed0e2e8682a4c4faa2a1a8a7ddd53ed4f854afeb46d8e304aa2da86fc0c5c48d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

application · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Soil and foliar iron applications did not influence oil content.

    Effect of Iron Fertilization on Nitrogen and Iron Content, Uptake and Quality Parameters of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2018

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Chelated zinc and iron soil plus foliar application gave the highest protein and oil content in summer groundnut, not significantly different among treatments.

    Effect of chelated zinc and iron on the uptake and quality parameters of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    That treatment produced the highest oil yield, 1486.76 kg.h−1.

    Response of Yield and Some Physiological Traits of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Topping Height and Application Methods of Zn and Ca Nano-Chelates · 2019

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Zn foliar application at flowering or seed filling significantly increased oil yield and seed protein content versus control.

    Effect of nitrogen fertilizer levels and zinc foliar application on yield, yield attributes and some chemical traits of groundnut · 2013 · compared with control treatment

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Disease control increased total oil content significantly.

    Effect of foliar diseases control by chlorothalonil on pod yield and quality characteristics of confectionery groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L) · 1993

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Iron spray at peg formation significantly increased protein and oil content.

    Effect of sulphur and iron on nutrient content, uptake and quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2020 · compared with 0.5% at flowering + peg formation stage

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Soil or foliar potassium applications significantly increased seed oil content relative to controls.

    Yield and Yield Components of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Response to Soil and Foliar Application of Potassium · 2015 · compared with control plants

    Same direction

  8. positive
    The integrated treatment improved oil content and yield in groundnut.

    Effect of integrated nitrogen management and foliar spray of iron on groundnut yield, quality and economics in arid region · 2020

    Same direction

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.