Claim · model-written summary
Direct-seeded output was comparable to medium-duration transplanted rice.
Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“which was comparable to that of TPD M”
Title
Xing Yu; Le Xu; Shen Yuan; et al. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136249
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Observation Direct-seeded rice produced 222.0 GJ ha −1 total energy output.
- Observation Direct-seeded output increased 9.5% versus short-duration transplanted rice.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding reduced total energy input 16.9% versus transplanting.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding reduced labor input 53.2%.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding reduced water input 36.8%.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding reduced nitrogen surplus 31.4%.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding significantly increased energy, labor, water and nitrogen efficiency.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding decreased direct methane and ammonia emissions.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding decreased indirect carbon emissions and reactive nitrogen losses.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding reduced carbon footprint by 28.6–42.7%.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding reduced nitrogen footprint by 12.9–14.8%.
- Intervention effect Direct seeding increased net ecosystem economic benefit by 65.9–188.2%.
- Recommendation The authors recommend direct-seeded rice as promising for high productivity with fewer inputs and impacts.