Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CO2 enrichment did not significantly change cooked-rice sensory properties.

A claim from Influence of free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on the eating quality of rice · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment did not significantly change cooked-rice sensory properties.

Treatment
CO 2 enrichment treatmente0
Outcome
sensory propertiese0
Direction
not significantly alterede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the sensory properties were not significantly altered by the CO 2 enrichment treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1102
e1

“Sensory evaluation of cooked rice with respect to umami (deliciousness), appearance, aroma, hardness, stickiness and overall palatability index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1000

Title

Influence of free‐air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on the eating quality of rice

Tomio Terao; Shu Miura; Tetsuji Yanagihara; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2005. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2165

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e8a72b953325d27ee0b3f1d26fa7367172c2c235b541659236b14862f3230eb7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

co2 · quality: general · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.