Claim · model-written summary
Virus-fungus-chestnut interactions could affect the success of chestnut blight biocontrol
- Taxon
- sweet chestnutt0
- Outcome
- success of chestnut blight biocontrole5
- Qualifier
- virus-fungus-chestnut interactionse5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue
Verbatim
t0“host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1”
e5“virus-fungus-chestnut interactions could have significant implications for the success of chestnut blight biocontrol”
Title
Ljiljana Krstin; Zorana Katanić; Marin Ježić; et al. Pest Management Science 2016. doi:10.1002/ps.4335
Other claims from this paper (6)
- Intervention effect Croatian CHV1 strain CR23 had a hypovirulent effect on the sweet chestnut host equal to the strong French strain CHV1-EP713
- Intervention effect Croatian CHV1 strain M56/1 had a weaker hypovirulent effect on the sweet chestnut host than the strong French strain CHV1-EP713
- Intervention effect CHV1 strains of the Italian subtype have hypovirulent effects on C. parasitica similar to those of the French subtype
- Observation The two Croatian CHV1 strains belong to the Italian subtype
- Association Hypovirus and fungus combinations induced various degrees of canker development on different chestnut genotypes
- Association Chestnut susceptibility and recovery could be influenced by the chestnut response to particular hypovirulent C. parasitica isolates