Paper · 2016 · Pest Management Science

Biological control of chestnut blight in Croatia: an interaction between host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1

Ljiljana Krstin; Zorana Katanić; Marin Ježić; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chestnut blight, caused by the fungus Cryphonectria parasitica, is a severe chestnut disease that can be controlled with naturally occurring hypoviruses in many areas of Europe. The aim of this research was to measure the effect of different Cryphonectria hypovirus 1 (CHV1) strains on the growth of the fungal host and select strains that could potentially be used for human-mediated biocontrol in forests and orchards, and to investigate whether and how chestnut-fungus-virus interactions affect the development and growth of the lesion area on cut stems. RESULTS: Two Croatian CHV1 strains (CR23 and M56/1) were selected as potential biocontrol agents. The sequencing of CHV1/ORF-A showed that both of these virus strains belonged to the Italian subtype of CHV1. In vitro transfection of selected virus strains from hypovirulent to genetically diverse virus-free fungal isolates and subsequent inoculation of all virus/fungus combinations on stems of genetically diverse sweet chestnut trees revealed that Croatian virus strain CR23 had an equally hypovirulent effect on the host as the strong French strain CHV1-EP713, while M56/1 had a weaker effect. Furthermore, it was shown that in some cases the same hypovirus/fungus combinations induced various degrees of canker development on different chestnut genotypes. CONCLUSION: Some CHV1 strains belonging to the Italian subtype have similar hypovirulent effects on C. parasitica to those belonging to the French subtype. Furthermore, chestnut susceptibility and recovery could be influenced by the response of chestnut trees to particular hypovirulent C. parasitica isolates, and virus-fungus-chestnut interactions could have significant implications for the success of chestnut blight biocontrol. © 2016 Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Croatian CHV1 strain CR23 had a hypovirulent effect on the sweet chestnut host equal to the strong French strain CHV1-EP713

Taxon
sweet chestnutt0
Treatment
Croatian virus strain CR23e2
Interactor
Cryphonectria parasiticaCryphonectria parasiticat0pathogen
Second interactor
Cryphonectria hypovirus 1Cryphonectria hypovirus 1t0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
hypovirulent effecte2
Direction
equallye2
Comparator
strong French strain CHV1-EP713e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryphonectria parasitica
Cryphonectria parasitica · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJoseph OBrien, USDA Forest Service · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–182 · show in text ↑
e2

“Croatian virus strain CR23 had an equally hypovirulent effect on the host as the strong French strain CHV1-EP713, while M56/1 had a weaker effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Croatian CHV1 strain M56/1 had a weaker hypovirulent effect on the sweet chestnut host than the strong French strain CHV1-EP713

Taxon
sweet chestnutt0
Treatment
M56/1e2
Interactor
Cryphonectria parasiticaCryphonectria parasiticat0pathogen
Second interactor
Cryphonectria hypovirus 1Cryphonectria hypovirus 1t0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
hypovirulent effecte2
Direction
weakere2
Comparator
strong French strain CHV1-EP713e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryphonectria parasitica
Cryphonectria parasitica · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJoseph OBrien, USDA Forest Service · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–182 · show in text ↑
e2

“Croatian virus strain CR23 had an equally hypovirulent effect on the host as the strong French strain CHV1-EP713, while M56/1 had a weaker effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1166 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CHV1 strains of the Italian subtype have hypovirulent effects on C. parasitica similar to those of the French subtype

Taxon
sweet chestnutt0
Treatment
CHV1 strains belonging to the Italian subtypee6
Interactor
C. parasiticaCryphonectria parasiticae6pathogen
Outcome
hypovirulent effects on C. parasiticae6
Direction
similare6
Comparator
French subtypee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryphonectria parasitica
Cryphonectria parasitica · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJoseph OBrien, USDA Forest Service · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–182 · show in text ↑
e6

“Some CHV1 strains belonging to the Italian subtype have similar hypovirulent effects on C. parasitica to those belonging to the French subtype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1485 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two Croatian CHV1 strains belong to the Italian subtype

Taxon
sweet chestnutt0
Interactor
CHV1Cryphonectria hypovirus 1e1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
belonged to the Italian subtypee1

Verbatim

t0

“host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–182 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sequencing of CHV1/ORF-A showed that both of these virus strains belonged to the Italian subtype of CHV1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–776 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hypovirus and fungus combinations induced various degrees of canker development on different chestnut genotypes

Taxon
sweet chestnutt0
Material
different chestnut genotypese3
Interactor
Cryphonectria parasiticaCryphonectria parasiticat0pathogen
Outcome
canker developmente3
Direction
various degreese3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryphonectria parasitica
Cryphonectria parasitica · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJoseph OBrien, USDA Forest Service · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–182 · show in text ↑
e3

“in some cases the same hypovirus/fungus combinations induced various degrees of canker development on different chestnut genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1329 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Chestnut susceptibility and recovery could be influenced by the chestnut response to particular hypovirulent C. parasitica isolates

Taxon
sweet chestnutt0
Interactor
C. parasiticaCryphonectria parasiticae4pathogen
Outcome
chestnut susceptibility and recoverye4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cryphonectria parasitica
Cryphonectria parasitica · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryJoseph OBrien, USDA Forest Service · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–182 · show in text ↑
e4

“chestnut susceptibility and recovery could be influenced by the response of chestnut trees to particular hypovirulent C. parasitica isolates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1500–1640 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Virus-fungus-chestnut interactions could affect the success of chestnut blight biocontrol

Taxon
sweet chestnutt0
Outcome
success of chestnut blight biocontrole5
Qualifier
virus-fungus-chestnut interactionse5

Verbatim

t0

“host sweet chestnut, its pathogen Cryphonectria parasitica and the biocontrol agent Cryphonectria hypovirus 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–182 · show in text ↑
e5

“virus-fungus-chestnut interactions could have significant implications for the success of chestnut blight biocontrol”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1646–1762 · show in text ↑

40268 · Cryphonectria parasitica · CastaneaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.