Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Split fertilizer application improved grain yield to 3165 kg ha.

A claim from Wheat yielding components response to different levels of fertilizer-N application time and decapitation stress. · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split fertilizer application improved grain yield to 3165 kg ha.

Treatment
split application of fertilizerNe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Value
3165 kg hae0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“split application of fertilizerN improved spikes m (353), grain spike (45), grain yield (3165 kg ha) and biological yield (10527 kg ha) as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1800–1958
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5

Title

Wheat yielding components response to different levels of fertilizer-N application time and decapitation stress.

Muhammad Zahir Afridi; M. T. Jan; Muhammad Arif; et al. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 2010

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e8bfce3b94b5aa600c4ecf8b431327d1de77c53c11f082d62164b7ece01c5590 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this claim · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

3,429 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.