Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Adding a non-ionic surfactant (0.2%) increased the efficacy of tribenuron compared with no surfactant.

A claim from Efficacy of Tribenuron-methyl Applied Alone and Tank Mix Against Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2008

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding a non-ionic surfactant (0.2%) increased the efficacy of tribenuron compared with no surfactant.

Treatment
Adding a non-ionic surfactant (0.2%)e3
Outcome
efficacye3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
no surfactante3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89
e3

“Adding a non-ionic surfactant (0.2%) increased the efficacy of tribenuron compared to no surfactant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–638

Title

Efficacy of Tribenuron-methyl Applied Alone and Tank Mix Against Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Samunder Singh; S. S. Punia; R. S. Balyan; et al. Indian Journal of Weed Science 2008

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-e8cad4420bb5db8ec4b343ced18c6cd6a9f5a91a5a4f0f38848fd7a4df9e725c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

nonionic surfactant · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.