Paper · 2008 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Efficacy of Tribenuron-methyl Applied Alone and Tank Mix Against Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Samunder Singh; S. S. Punia; R. S. Balyan; et al.

20
claims
41
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field and pot studies were carried out to evaluate the efficacy of tribenuron-methyl 75% PX (paste extruded) formulation used alone and tank mixed with grassy (field conditions) and broadleaf (screen house) herbicides during 2006–07 and 2007–08 at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar. Tribenuron 15 g/ha was effective against Chenopodium album under field conditions and provided 85–88% control. Increasing the dose from 15 to 30 g/ha or to 45 g/ha further increased control of C. album, but the effect was similar at higher rates. Adding a non-ionic surfactant (0.2%) increased the efficacy of tribenuron compared to no surfactant. 2,4-D ester/amine 500 g/ha or Sodium salt 1000 g/ha provided 100% control of C. album and the mortality was similar to premix of mesosulfuron+iodosulfuron (Atlantis) 21.6 and 14.4 g/ha, premix of sulfosulfuron+metsulfuron (Total) 16 g/ha, metsulfuron-methyl 4 g/ha or higher rates of tribenuron (26.25, 30 and 45 g/ha with and without surfactant). Tribenuron had no adverse effect on wheat upto 45 g/ha and no residual phytotoxicity was observed on mungbean or sorghum planted after wheat harvest. Effect of carfentrazone 20 g/ha and tribenuron 15 g/ha was similar against C. album but lower than other treatments. All broadleaf herbicides provided significantly higher yield compared to weedy plots, but were inferior to pre- or tank-mix applications of grassy and broadleaf herbicides. Atlantis 21.6 g/ha was phytotoxic to wheat and significantly checked plant growth and produced lower yield than 14.4 g/ha application rate. Tank mix applications of pinoxaden 45 g/ha and clodinafop 60 g/ha with tribenuron 15 g/ha produced highest yield and yield attributes of wheat. Under pot studies, tribenuron 15 g/ha, carfentrazone 20 g/ha, metsulfuron 4 g/ha, 2,4-D ester 250 g/ha and their tank mix combinations were compared with 2,4-D 500 g/ha against Anagallis arvensis, Asphodelus tenuifolius, Chenopodium album, C. murale, Lathyrus aphaca, Melilotus indica, Malva parviflora, Medicago denticulata, Rumex dentatus, R. spinosus, Silene conoidea, Sisymbrium irio and Vicia sativa. Tribenuron 15 g/ha provided 73 to 100% control of A. arvensis, A. tenuifolius, M. denticulata, V. sativa, C. murale, R. spinosus, R. dentatus, C. album, S. irio and S. conoidea, but it was not effective against M. parviflora and L. aphaca. Effect was also lower on M. indica, but tank mix applications with carfentrazone/2,4-D or metsulfuron improved its control by 15 to 25%. The overall weed mortality by tribenuron was similar to that of carfentrazone, but better than 2,4-D 250 g/ha, though the effect was significantly less than metsulfuron or 2,4-D 500 g/ha. Tank mixing of carfentrazone with metsulfuron inflicted maximum weed mortality (data averaged over species), but it was statistically similar to all other mixtures except carfentrazone plus 2,4-D 250 g/ha which has significantly less weed mortality. Similar trend was recorded in fresh weight accumulation by weeds with different treatments. L. aphaca and M. parviflora were most difficult-to-control weeds, whereas S. conoidea and S. irio were most susceptible weeds (data averaged over herbicide treatments). Tribenuron 15 g/ha had no significant edge over metsulfuron 4 g/ha against any of the test species in the screen house, though in tank mix applications with pinoxaden and clodinafop it produced similar yield compared to recommended field herbicides, with the advantage of no residual toxicity on succeeding sensitive crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tribenuron 15 g/ha was effective against Chenopodium album under field conditions, giving 85-88% control.

Treatment
Tribenuron 15 g/hae1
Interactor
Chenopodium albumChenopodium albume1weed
Outcome
controle1
Direction
effectivee1
Value
85–88%e1
Setting
field conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tribenuron 15 g/ha was effective against Chenopodium album under field conditions and provided 85–88% control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising tribenuron from 15 to 30 or 45 g/ha further increased control of C. album; the effect was similar at the higher rates.

Treatment
Increasing the dose from 15 to 30 g/ha or to 45 g/hae2
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume2weed
Outcome
controle2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
the effect was similar at higher ratese2
Comparator
from 15e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e2

“Increasing the dose from 15 to 30 g/ha or to 45 g/ha further increased control of C. album, but the effect was similar at higher rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding a non-ionic surfactant (0.2%) increased the efficacy of tribenuron compared with no surfactant.

Treatment
Adding a non-ionic surfactant (0.2%)e3
Outcome
efficacye3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
no surfactante3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e3

“Adding a non-ionic surfactant (0.2%) increased the efficacy of tribenuron compared to no surfactant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 539–638 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D ester/amine 500 g/ha or sodium salt 1000 g/ha gave 100% control of C. album.

Treatment
2,4-D ester/amine 500 g/ha or Sodium salt 1000 g/hae4
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume4weed
Outcome
controle4
Direction
providede4
Value
100%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e4

“2,4-D ester/amine 500 g/ha or Sodium salt 1000 g/ha provided 100% control of C. album”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–725 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tribenuron up to 45 g/ha had no adverse effect on wheat.

Treatment
Tribenurone5
Outcome
adverse effect on wheate5
Qualifier
upto 45 g/hae5

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e5

“Tribenuron had no adverse effect on wheat upto 45 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No residual phytotoxicity was seen on mungbean or sorghum sown after wheat harvest.

Taxon
mungbean or sorghumSorghumVigna radiatae6
Outcome
residual phytotoxicitye6
Qualifier
planted after wheat harveste6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“no residual phytotoxicity was observed on mungbean or sorghum planted after wheat harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carfentrazone 20 g/ha and tribenuron 15 g/ha were similar against C. album but lower than the other treatments.

Treatment
carfentrazone 20 g/ha and tribenuron 15 g/hae7
Interactor
C. albumChenopodium albume7weed
Outcome
Effecte7
Direction
lowere7
Comparator
other treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chenopodium album
Chenopodium album · InteractorOlivier Pichard · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e7

“Effect of carfentrazone 20 g/ha and tribenuron 15 g/ha was similar against C. album but lower than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All broadleaf herbicides gave significantly higher wheat yield than weedy plots.

Treatment
All broadleaf herbicidese1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
weedy plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“All broadleaf herbicides provided significantly higher yield compared to weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All broadleaf herbicides gave lower yield than pre- or tank-mix applications of grassy and broadleaf herbicides.

Treatment
All broadleaf herbicidese1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
inferiore2
Comparator
pre- or tank-mix applications of grassy and broadleaf herbicidese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“All broadleaf herbicides provided significantly higher yield compared to weedy plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1339 · show in text ↑
e2

“were inferior to pre- or tank-mix applications of grassy and broadleaf herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1426 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Atlantis 21.6 g/ha was phytotoxic to wheat and significantly checked plant growth.

Treatment
Atlantis 21.6 g/hae1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Direction
checkede1
Qualifier
phytotoxic to wheate1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Atlantis 21.6 g/ha was phytotoxic to wheat and significantly checked plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1509 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atlantis 21.6 g/ha produced lower wheat yield than 14.4 g/ha.

Treatment
Atlantis 21.6 g/hae1
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
14.4 g/ha application ratee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Atlantis 21.6 g/ha was phytotoxic to wheat and significantly checked plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1509 · show in text ↑
e2

“produced lower yield than 14.4 g/ha application rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixes of pinoxaden 45 g/ha and clodinafop 60 g/ha with tribenuron 15 g/ha gave the highest wheat yield and yield attributes, similar to recommended field herbicides.

Treatment
Tank mix applications of pinoxaden 45 g/ha and clodinafop 60 g/ha with tribenuron 15 g/hae1
Outcome
yield and yield attributese1
Direction
higheste1
Qualifier
similar yield compared to recommended field herbicidese2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tank mix applications of pinoxaden 45 g/ha and clodinafop 60 g/ha with tribenuron 15 g/ha produced highest yield and yield attributes of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1568–1710 · show in text ↑
e2

“in tank mix applications with pinoxaden and clodinafop it produced similar yield compared to recommended field herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3321–3442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In pot studies, tribenuron 15 g/ha gave 73 to 100% control of ten broadleaf weeds, including A. arvensis and A. tenuifolius.

Treatment
Tribenuron 15 g/hae1
Interactor
A. arvensisLysimachia arvensise1weed
Second interactor
A. tenuifoliusAsphodelus tenuifoliuse1weed
Outcome
controle1
Direction
providede1
Value
73 to 100%e1
Setting
pot studiese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lysimachia arvensis
Lysimachia arvensis · InteractorAlvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Asphodelus tenuifolius
Asphodelus tenuifolius · Second interactorKhalid Mahmood · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under pot studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1712–1729 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tribenuron 15 g/ha provided 73 to 100% control of A. arvensis, A. tenuifolius, M. denticulata, V. sativa, C. murale, R. spinosus, R. dentatus, C. album, S. irio and S. conoidea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tribenuron 15 g/ha was not effective against M. parviflora and L. aphaca in pot studies.

Treatment
Tribenuron 15 g/hae1
Interactor
M. parviflorae2weed
Second interactor
L. aphacaLathyrus aphacae2weed
Outcome
effective against M. parviflorae2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lathyrus aphaca
Lathyrus aphaca · Second interactorLeif Stridvall · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tribenuron 15 g/ha provided 73 to 100% control of A. arvensis, A. tenuifolius, M. denticulata, V. sativa, C. murale, R. spinosus, R. dentatus, C. album, S. irio and S. conoidea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2118–2294 · show in text ↑
e2

“but it was not effective against M. parviflora and L. aphaca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2296–2356 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixes of tribenuron with carfentrazone/2,4-D or metsulfuron improved M. indica control by 15 to 25%, although tribenuron alone was lower on M. indica.

Treatment
tank mix applications with carfentrazone/2,4-D or metsulfurone1
Interactor
M. indicaMelilotus indicuse1weed
Outcome
controle1
Direction
improvede1
Value
15 to 25%e1
Qualifier
Effect was also lower on M. indicae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Melilotus indicus
Melilotus indicus · InteractorZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect was also lower on M. indica, but tank mix applications with carfentrazone/2,4-D or metsulfuron improved its control by 15 to 25%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2358–2493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall weed mortality by tribenuron was similar to carfentrazone, better than 2,4-D 250 g/ha, and significantly less than metsulfuron or 2,4-D 500 g/ha.

Treatment
tribenurone1
Outcome
overall weed mortalitye1
Direction
lesse1
Qualifier
better than 2,4-D 250 g/hae1
Comparator
metsulfuron or 2,4-D 500 g/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“The overall weed mortality by tribenuron was similar to that of carfentrazone, but better than 2,4-D 250 g/ha, though the effect was significantly less than metsulfuron or 2,4-D 500 g/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2495–2681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tank mixing carfentrazone with metsulfuron gave the maximum weed mortality; only carfentrazone plus 2,4-D 250 g/ha was significantly lower.

Treatment
Tank mixing of carfentrazone with metsulfurone1
Outcome
weed mortalitye1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
all other mixturese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tank mixing of carfentrazone with metsulfuron inflicted maximum weed mortality (data averaged over species), but it was statistically similar to all other mixtures except carfentrazone plus 2,4-D 250 g/ha which has significantly less weed mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2683–2931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tribenuron 15 g/ha had no significant edge over metsulfuron 4 g/ha against any test species in the screen house.

Treatment
Tribenuron 15 g/hae1
Outcome
edgee1
Comparator
metsulfuron 4 g/hae1
Setting
screen housee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tribenuron 15 g/ha had no significant edge over metsulfuron 4 g/ha against any of the test species in the screen house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3194–3312 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed fresh weight accumulation followed a similar trend across treatments.

Outcome
fresh weight accumulatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“Similar trend was recorded in fresh weight accumulation by weeds with different treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2933–3023 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. aphaca and M. parviflora were the most difficult-to-control weeds, whereas S. conoidea and S. irio were the most susceptible.

Interactor
L. aphacaLathyrus aphacae1weed
Second interactor
M. parviflorae1weed
Outcome
difficult-to-controle1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lathyrus aphaca
Lathyrus aphaca · InteractorLeif Stridvall · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Broadleaf Weeds of Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–89 · show in text ↑
e1

“L. aphaca and M. parviflora were most difficult-to-control weeds, whereas S. conoidea and S. irio were most susceptible weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3025–3150 · show in text ↑

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

tribenuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

tribenuron · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

2,4-D · Chenopodium album · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nonionic surfactant · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.