Abstract
Inability to control Italian ryegrass in soft red winter wheat can result in reduced yields, reduced quality, or both and cause double-crop planting to be inefficient. Experiments were conducted at Plains, GA, to evaluate diclofop-susceptible Italian ryegrass control in a single-gene imidazolinone (IMI)-resistant wheat using imazamox, mesosulfuron, and diclofop. Treatments were applied at variable rates and tank mixtures to the IMI-resistant soft red winter wheat ‘AGS CL7’ at Feekes' stages 1 (EMERG) or 2 (POST). Lower Italian ryegrass control of 78% or less was observed with single treatments of EMERG or POST herbicide applications. Diclofop provided maximum Italian ryegrass control of 79% or greater with minimal injury to wheat cultivar AGS CL 7. Sequential applications of diclofop at EMERG followed by imazamox, mesosulfuron, or diclofop POST provided maximum Italian ryegrass control at 86% or greater. The efficacy of the acetolactate synthase (ALS)–inhibiting herbicides registered for wheat weed control for AGS CL7 and ‘AGS 2000’ (conventional) was also evaluated. Mesosulfuron at 40 g ai ha −1 resulted in 17% injury at 7 d after application (DAA), tribenuron at 40 g ai ha −1 caused 9% injury 7 DAA, and pyroxsulam at 190 g ai ha −1 caused 7% injury at 7 DAA, but was transient and not observed after heading or at harvest. No yield differences were noted between the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7 for chlorsulfuron, mesosulfuron, thifensulfuron, tribenuron, prosulfuron, and pyroxsulam.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Single EMERG or POST herbicide applications gave lower Italian ryegrass control, 78% or less.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- single treatments of EMERG or POST herbicide applicationse1
- Interactor
- Italian ryegrass
Lolium multiflorume1weed - Outcome
- Italian ryegrass controle1
- Direction
- Lowere1
- Value
- 78% or lesse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“Lower Italian ryegrass control of 78% or less was observed with single treatments of EMERG or POST herbicide applications”
Claim · model-written summary
Diclofop gave maximum Italian ryegrass control of 79% or greater in AGS CL 7 wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AGS CL 7e1
- Treatment
- Diclofope1
- Interactor
- Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume1weed
- Outcome
- Italian ryegrass controle1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 79% or greatere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“Diclofop provided maximum Italian ryegrass control of 79% or greater with minimal injury to wheat cultivar AGS CL 7”
Claim · model-written summary
Diclofop caused minimal injury to wheat cultivar AGS CL 7.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AGS CL 7e1
- Treatment
- Diclofope1
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede1
- Qualifier
- minimale1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“Diclofop provided maximum Italian ryegrass control of 79% or greater with minimal injury to wheat cultivar AGS CL 7”
Claim · model-written summary
Sequential EMERG diclofop followed by POST imazamox, mesosulfuron or diclofop gave maximum Italian ryegrass control of 86% or greater.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Sequential applications of diclofop at EMERG followed by imazamox, mesosulfuron, or diclofop POSTe1
- Interactor
- Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume1weed
- Outcome
- Italian ryegrass controle1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Value
- 86% or greatere1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“Sequential applications of diclofop at EMERG followed by imazamox, mesosulfuron, or diclofop POST provided maximum Italian ryegrass control at 86% or greater”
Claim · model-written summary
Mesosulfuron at 40 g ai ha −1 caused 17% injury to wheat at 7 DAA.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Mesosulfuron at 40 g ai ha −1e1
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 17%e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“Mesosulfuron at 40 g ai ha −1 resulted in 17% injury at 7 d after application (DAA), tribenuron at 40 g ai ha −1 caused 9% injury 7 DAA, and pyroxsulam at 190 g ai ha −1 caused 7% injury at 7 DAA, but was transient and not observed after heading or at harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
Tribenuron at 40 g ai ha −1 caused 9% injury to wheat at 7 DAA.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- tribenuron at 40 g ai ha −1e1
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 9% injurye1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“Mesosulfuron at 40 g ai ha −1 resulted in 17% injury at 7 d after application (DAA), tribenuron at 40 g ai ha −1 caused 9% injury 7 DAA, and pyroxsulam at 190 g ai ha −1 caused 7% injury at 7 DAA, but was transient and not observed after heading or at harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
Pyroxsulam at 190 g ai ha −1 caused 7% injury to wheat at 7 DAA, which was transient and not observed after heading or at harvest.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pyroxsulam at 190 g ai ha −1e1
- Outcome
- injurye1
- Direction
- increaseinferrede1
- Value
- 7%e1
- Qualifier
- transient and not observed after heading or at harveste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“pyroxsulam at 190 g ai ha −1 caused 7% injury at 7 DAA, but was transient and not observed after heading or at harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
Chlorsulfuron did not change wheat yield compared with the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7e1
- Treatment
- chlorsulfurone1
- Outcome
- yield differencese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- nontreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“No yield differences were noted between the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7 for chlorsulfuron, mesosulfuron, thifensulfuron, tribenuron, prosulfuron, and pyroxsulam”
Claim · model-written summary
Mesosulfuron did not change wheat yield compared with the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7e1
- Treatment
- mesosulfurone1
- Outcome
- yield differencese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- nontreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“No yield differences were noted between the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7 for chlorsulfuron, mesosulfuron, thifensulfuron, tribenuron, prosulfuron, and pyroxsulam”
Claim · model-written summary
Thifensulfuron did not change wheat yield compared with the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7e1
- Treatment
- thifensulfurone1
- Outcome
- yield differencese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- nontreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“No yield differences were noted between the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7 for chlorsulfuron, mesosulfuron, thifensulfuron, tribenuron, prosulfuron, and pyroxsulam”
Claim · model-written summary
Tribenuron did not change wheat yield compared with the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7e1
- Treatment
- tribenurone1
- Outcome
- yield differencese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- nontreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“No yield differences were noted between the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7 for chlorsulfuron, mesosulfuron, thifensulfuron, tribenuron, prosulfuron, and pyroxsulam”
Claim · model-written summary
Prosulfuron did not change wheat yield compared with the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7e1
- Treatment
- prosulfurone1
- Outcome
- yield differencese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- nontreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“No yield differences were noted between the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7 for chlorsulfuron, mesosulfuron, thifensulfuron, tribenuron, prosulfuron, and pyroxsulam”
Claim · model-written summary
Pyroxsulam did not change wheat yield compared with the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Material
- AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7e1
- Treatment
- pyroxsulame1
- Outcome
- yield differencese1
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede1
- Comparator
- nontreated controle1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Imidazolinone-Resistant Soft Red Winter Wheat”
e1“No yield differences were noted between the nontreated control for AGS 2000 and AGS CL 7 for chlorsulfuron, mesosulfuron, thifensulfuron, tribenuron, prosulfuron, and pyroxsulam”
The same questions in other papers
chlorsulfuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
27 papers more in this group
See all 31 papers →diclofop · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
diclofop · Lolium multiflorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →tribenuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →imazamox · Lolium multiflorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
tribenuron · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →thifensulfuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
4 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →herbicide · Lolium multiflorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.