Paper · 1994 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Effect of Clopyralid Alone and as Tank Mixture With Isoproturon on Weed Control in Wheat

R.S. Panwar; S. S. Rathi; R.K. Malik; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field expriments were done during winter seasons of 1990–91 and 1991–92 at CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India. Application of isoproturon at 0.75 and 1.0 kg and f1uroxypyr at 0.20 and 0.30 kg/ha done and combination of isoproturon 0.75 kg with 2.4-D at 0.25 or 0.50 kg/ha or with f1uroxypyr 0.10 or 0.20 kg or tribenuron at 5.0 and 7.5 g/ha provided effective control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativa. The control ranged from 70–90% and 67–93% during 1990 and 1991. respectively. Tribenuron at 7.5 or 10 g/ha failed to provide satisfactory control of weeds. All herbicide treatments gave significantly better crop yield than weedy check. On an average of two seasons, combination of isoproturon+f1uroxypyr 0.75+0.10 and 0.75+0.20 kg/ha and isoproturon+tribenuron at 0.75 kg+5.0 g or 0.75 kg+7.5 g/ha and isoproturon alone at 1.0 kg/ha proved better than other herbicide treatments and thus provided grain yield statistically similar to that of weed free yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isoproturon at 0.75 and 1.0 kg provided effective control of three weeds.

Treatment
isoproturon at 0.75 and 1.0 kge0
Interactor
C. albume0weed
Outcome
control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of isoproturon at 0.75 and 1.0 kg and f1uroxypyr at 0.20 and 0.30 kg/ha done and combination of isoproturon 0.75 kg with 2.4-D at 0.25 or 0.50 kg/ha or with f1uroxypyr 0.10 or 0.20 kg or tribenuron at 5.0 and 7.5 g/ha provided effective control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluroxypyr at 0.20 and 0.30 kg/ha provided effective weed control.

Treatment
f1uroxypyr at 0.20 and 0.30 kg/hae0
Interactor
C. albume0weed
Outcome
control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“f1uroxypyr at 0.20 and 0.30 kg/ha done and combination of isoproturon 0.75 kg with 2.4-D at 0.25 or 0.50 kg/ha or with f1uroxypyr 0.10 or 0.20 kg or tribenuron at 5.0 and 7.5 g/ha provided effective control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isoproturon and 2.4-D combinations provided effective weed control.

Treatment
isoproturon 0.75 kg with 2.4-D at 0.25 or 0.50 kg/hae0
Interactor
C. albume0weed
Outcome
control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of isoproturon 0.75 kg with 2.4-D at 0.25 or 0.50 kg/ha or with f1uroxypyr 0.10 or 0.20 kg or tribenuron at 5.0 and 7.5 g/ha provided effective control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isoproturon and fluroxypyr combinations provided effective weed control.

Treatment
f1uroxypyr 0.10 or 0.20 kge0
Interactor
C. albume0weed
Outcome
control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of isoproturon 0.75 kg with 2.4-D at 0.25 or 0.50 kg/ha or with f1uroxypyr 0.10 or 0.20 kg or tribenuron at 5.0 and 7.5 g/ha provided effective control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The isoproturon and tribenuron combinations provided effective weed control.

Treatment
tribenuron at 5.0 and 7.5 g/hae0
Interactor
C. albume0weed
Outcome
control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativae0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of isoproturon 0.75 kg with 2.4-D at 0.25 or 0.50 kg/ha or with f1uroxypyr 0.10 or 0.20 kg or tribenuron at 5.0 and 7.5 g/ha provided effective control of C. album, F. parvif1ora and V. sativa.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control ranged from 70–90% in 1990 and 67–93% in 1991.

Outcome
controle0
Value
70–90% and 67–93%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control ranged from 70–90% and 67–93% during 1990 and 1991. respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tribenuron at 7.5 or 10 g/ha failed to provide satisfactory weed control.

Treatment
Tribenuron at 7.5 or 10 g/hae0
Outcome
control of weedse0
Direction
failed to provide satisfactorye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tribenuron at 7.5 or 10 g/ha failed to provide satisfactory control of weeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicide treatments gave significantly better wheat yield than the weedy check.

Treatment
All herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicide treatments gave significantly better crop yield than weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The listed isoproturon combinations and isoproturon alone yielded similarly to weed-free plots and better than other herbicides.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
statistically similare0
Qualifier
On an average of two seasonse0
Comparator
weed free yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On an average of two seasons, combination of isoproturon+f1uroxypyr 0.75+0.10 and 0.75+0.20 kg/ha and isoproturon+tribenuron at 0.75 kg+5.0 g or 0.75 kg+7.5 g/ha and isoproturon alone at 1.0 kg/ha proved better than other herbicide treatments and thus provided grain yield statistically similar to that of weed free yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–88 · show in text ↑

tribenuron · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

tribenuron · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

isoproturon · control · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.