Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar spray of 2.0% urea + DAP + MOP increased harvest index to 0.36.

A claim from Enhancing productivity and nutritional quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) through foliar nutrition · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spray of 2.0% urea + DAP + MOP increased harvest index to 0.36.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
foliar spray of 2.0% urea + DAP + MOPe1
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.36e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–81
e1

“100 pod weight (117.65 g), total number of pods plant-1 (28.37), 100 kernel weight (42.19 g), pod yield (3746 kg ha-1), kernel yield (2905 kg ha-1), haulm yield (4253 kg ha-1) and harvest index (0.36) were also higher in foliar spray of 2.0% urea + DAP + MOP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–822

Title

Enhancing productivity and nutritional quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) through foliar nutrition

S. R. Salakinkop; Ashoka Mb Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e8d3c63a370fb3b9556d62586197ca9fc35c65a794cf688b00115b302f26ff16 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

145 papers: 125 positive, 20 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. positive

213 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.