Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar treatment significantly increased potassium uptake to 357.95 kg K2O, compared with control.

A claim from Enhancing productivity and nutritional quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) through foliar nutrition · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar treatment significantly increased potassium uptake to 357.95 kg K2O, compared with control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
foliar treatmente2
Outcome
nutrient uptakee2
Direction
highere2
Value
357.95 kg K2Oe2
Comparator
controle2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–81
e2

“Oil content (46.73%), protein content (27.65), oil yield (1356kg ha-1) and nutrient uptake (209.66 kg N, 32.25 kg P2O5, and 357.95 kg K2O) were significantly higher in foliar treatment compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–1027

Title

Enhancing productivity and nutritional quality of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) through foliar nutrition

S. R. Salakinkop; Ashoka Mb Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-f688208d17c42335d5494ce3f1eaf84d49c4648623eb89ffd75f762c8145a9a7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 42 positive, 3 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Foliar N, P, K and S fertilization did not increase nutrient uptake of peanuts.

    Foliar Fertilization Effects on Yield, Quality, Nutrient Uptake, and Vegetative Characteristics of Florunner Peanuts.1,2 · 1982

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar FeSO4 spray at different stages had no significant difference in available soil N, P, K, S and Fe.

    Effect of Sulphur and Iron on chlorophyll Content, Leghaemoglobin Content, Soil Properties and Optimum Dose of Sulphurfor Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2019

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Foliar iron had no significant effect on measured soil fertility status.

    Nitrogen use efficiency and soil fertility as influenced by integrated nitrogen management and foliar spray of iron in groundnut on Typic Ustochrept · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Foliar application of SNP enhanced the availability of Fe in peanut.

    Role of exogenous nitric oxide in alleviating iron deficiency-induced peanut chlorosis on calcareous soil · 2013

    Same direction

  5. positive
    The specified sulfur, zinc and boron treatment gave the highest seed nutrient contents.

    Effect of sulfur application and foliar spraying with zinc and boron on yield, yield components, and seed quality of peanut (arachis hypogaea l.) · 2013

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Foliar fertilization increased calcium concentration in each subcellular fraction of peanut leaves.

    Spraying sorbitol-chelated calcium affected foliar calcium absorption and promoted the yield of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) · 2022

    Same direction

  7. positive
    The same spray increased DNA, RNA and amino nitrogen content.

    Combination of Trichoderma viride and Pseudomonas fluorescens for the enhanced control of Fusarium wilt disease caused by Fusarium oxysporum infecting Arachis hypogaea L. · 2019

    Same direction

  8. positive
    That treatment produced the highest seed Zn content, 12.08 ppm.

    Response of Yield and Some Physiological Traits of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to Topping Height and Application Methods of Zn and Ca Nano-Chelates · 2019

    Same direction

36 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.