Mechanismmodel-written summary

Traditional stage II apparently reflects the timing of a shift between two sink-activity phases.

A claim from Modeling Peach Fruit Growth and Carbohydrate Requirements: Reevaluation of the Double-sigmoid Growth Pattern · 1989

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Traditional stage II apparently reflects the timing of a shift between two sink-activity phases.

Outcome
traditional stage II of fruit growthe0
Qualifier
timing of the shift between these two physiological phases of sink activitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The traditional stage II of fruit growth is apparently a function of the timing of the shift between these two physiological phases of sink activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–782
t0

“Peach Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 9–20

Title

Modeling Peach Fruit Growth and Carbohydrate Requirements: Reevaluation of the Double-sigmoid Growth Pattern

T. M. DeJong; J. Goudriaan Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1989. doi:10.21273/jashs.114.5.800

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-e8e3f29a0ce8d3d5612ea7b50d2bc4bb2dda3dbac685b172cd3114c67508c3d3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer