Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Repeated chlorantraniliprole applications reduced corn kernel injury by 80-93% in Florence.

A claim from Impact of Corn Earworm Injury on Yield of Transgenic Corn Producing Bt Toxins in the Carolinas · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated chlorantraniliprole applications reduced corn kernel injury by 80-93% in Florence.

Treatment
insecticide applications (chlorantraniliprole) every 3-4 d from R1e0
Interactor
H. zeaHelicoverpa zeae0pest
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
80-93%e0
Setting
Florencee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicoverpa zea
Helicoverpa zea · InteractorAndy Reago & Chrissy McClarren · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insecticide applications (chlorantraniliprole) every 3-4 d from R1 until H. zea had cycled out of corn reduced injury by 80-93% in Florence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 287–426
t0

“Corn Earworm Injury on Yield of Transgenic Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–57

Title

Impact of Corn Earworm Injury on Yield of Transgenic Corn Producing Bt Toxins in the Carolinas

Francis P. F. Reay-Jones; Dominic D. Reisig Journal of Economic Entomology 2014. doi:10.1603/ec13516

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-e8fa792f0cbdba1c8e8b440d559e71aabbb154807fb4913cd05eafc38c3f01e0 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

insecticide · Helicoverpa zea · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.