Claim · model-written summary
The lower pre-harvest rate caused no significant depression in grain germination.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaret0 - Treatment
- lower rate of pre‐harvest applicatione3
- Outcome
- grain germinatione3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“in barley”
e3“No significant depressions in grain germination were recorded from the lower rate of pre‐harvest application but one significant depression was recorded from the higher rate”
Title
B. W. SHEPPARD; M. C. RICHARDS; J. A. PASCAL Weed Research 1984. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3180.1984.tb00565.x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Pre-harvest glyphosate gave 95–99% control of A. repens in barley, compared with 0–76% control after post-harvest application.
- Intervention effect Crop yields in 1981 were significantly increased after all the 1980 pre-harvest treatments.
- Intervention effect Crop yields in 1981 were significantly increased after one post-harvest treatment in 1980.
- Intervention effect The higher pre-harvest rate caused a significant depression in grain germination.
- Intervention effect Pre-harvest application significantly improved combine harvesting throughput at a given grain loss level.
- Intervention effect Pre-harvest application significantly reduced grain moisture content at harvest by up to 2·5%.
- Observation Wheeling losses from pre-harvest spraying ranged from 1 to 5%.
- Observation Crop yield increases in the year after spraying compensated for herbicide and application costs plus any yield losses from tractor wheelings.