Claim · model-written summary
Individual crops and weed management systems affected weed densities and yellow nutsedge tubers.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- weed management systemse0
- Outcome
- they were affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“they were affected by individual crops and weed management systems in each crop”
t0“peanut—corn and peanut—cotton rotations”
Title
W. Carroll Johnson; B. G. Mullinix Weed Science 1997. doi:10.1017/s0043174500092638
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Crop rotations did not affect weed density or yellow nutsedge tuber numbers.
- Intervention effect Fallow plots had more yellow nutsedge plants and tubers than other plots, including with intensive fallow management.
- Intervention effect Moderate and intensive weed control in peanut and cotton reduced yellow nutsedge density and tubers.
- Intervention effect Intensive weed management increased peanut yields.
- Intervention effect Weed management did not affect yellow nutsedge density in corn.
- Intervention effect Moderate and intensive weed management increased corn yields through improved control of other weeds.
- Recommendation The authors recommend uninterrupted peanut, corn or cotton with moderate weed management to suppress yellow nutsedge and optimize yield.
- Association Fallow fields were predicted to experience exponential increases in yellow nutsedge density and tubers despite intensive management.