Paper · 1997 · Weed Science

Population dynamics of yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) in cropping systems in the southeastern coastal plain

W. Carroll Johnson; B. G. Mullinix

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
26
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Studies were conducted from 1990 through 1994 near Tifton, GA, on the population dynamics of yellow nutsedge and certain annual weeds in peanut—corn and peanut—cotton rotations. Converse rotation sequences were included to eliminate year effects. Continuous fallow plots (noncrop) were included for comparison. Within each crop, including fallow, were 3 levels of weed management: low, moderate, and intensive. Weed densities and numbers of yellow nutsedge tubers were not affected by crop rotations, but they were affected by individual crops and weed management systems in each crop. Fallow plots, including those with intensive fallow weed management using tillage and nonselective herbicides, consistently contained more yellow nutsedge plants and tubers than other plots. Moderate and intensive weed control systems in peanut and cotton reduced yellow nutsedge densities and tubers, but only peanut yields were increased by intensive weed management. Weed management systems did not affect yellow nutsedge densities in corn, although yields were increased by moderate and intensive systems due to improved control of other weeds. Our results suggest that uninterrupted plantings of peanut, corn, or cotton with moderate levels of weed management are generally sufficient to suppress yellow nutsedge and allow for optimum crop yield. If fields are fallow, yellow nutsedge population densities and tubers will increase exponentially, even with intensive fallow weed management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotations did not affect weed density or yellow nutsedge tuber numbers.

Treatment
crop rotationse0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
Weed densities and numbers of yellow nutsedge tuberse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed densities and numbers of yellow nutsedge tubers were not affected by crop rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut—corn and peanut—cotton rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–176 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual crops and weed management systems affected weed densities and yellow nutsedge tubers.

Treatment
weed management systemse0
Outcome
they were affectede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they were affected by individual crops and weed management systems in each crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–584 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut—corn and peanut—cotton rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow plots had more yellow nutsedge plants and tubers than other plots, including with intensive fallow management.

Treatment
Fallow plotse0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedge plants and tuberse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
other plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fallow plots, including those with intensive fallow weed management using tillage and nonselective herbicides, consistently contained more yellow nutsedge plants and tubers than other plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut—corn and peanut—cotton rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–176 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate and intensive weed control in peanut and cotton reduced yellow nutsedge density and tubers.

Treatment
Moderate and intensive weed control systemse0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedge densities and tuberse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate and intensive weed control systems in peanut and cotton reduced yellow nutsedge densities and tubers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–886 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive weed management increased peanut yields.

Treatment
intensive weed managemente0
Outcome
peanut yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“only peanut yields were increased by intensive weed management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management did not affect yellow nutsedge density in corn.

Treatment
Weed management systemse0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedge densitiese0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed management systems did not affect yellow nutsedge densities in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1028 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate and intensive weed management increased corn yields through improved control of other weeds.

Treatment
moderate and intensive systemse0
Interactor
other weedse0weed
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields were increased by moderate and intensive systems due to improved control of other weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“densities in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1028 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend uninterrupted peanut, corn or cotton with moderate weed management to suppress yellow nutsedge and optimize yield.

Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
moderate levels of weed managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“uninterrupted plantings of peanut, corn, or cotton with moderate levels of weed management are generally sufficient to suppress yellow nutsedge and allow for optimum crop yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1336 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fallow fields were predicted to experience exponential increases in yellow nutsedge density and tubers despite intensive management.

Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedge population densities and tuberse0
Direction
increase exponentiallye0
Setting
fieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“If fields are fallow, yellow nutsedge population densities and tubers will increase exponentially, even with intensive fallow weed management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1479 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut—corn and peanut—cotton rotations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 137–176 · show in text ↑

rotation · weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

230 papers: 172 positive, 58 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

226 papers more in this group

See all 230 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.