Paper · 2002 · Weed Technology

Effect of Continuous Imidazolinone Herbicide Use on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Populations in Peanut1

W. JAMES GRICHAR

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted from 1994 through 1996 to evaluate the effects of imazapic applied postemergence (POST) at 0.05 and 0.07 kg ai/ha, imazethapyr applied preplant incorporated (PPI) or POST at 0.07 kg ai/ha, and metolachlor applied PPI at 1.7 kg ai/ha on yellow nutsedge control, nutsedge tuber density, and peanut yield. All herbicides controlled yellow nutsedge at least 75% after 3 yr. Imazapic at 0.05 and 0.07 kg/ha controlled yellow nutsedge more consistently than did imazethapyr or metolachlor. Imazethapyr applied POST controlled yellow nutsedge more effectively than did imazethapyr applied PPI. Yellow nutsedge tuber densities in herbicide-treated plots were 51 to 75% less than in untreated control plots. Plots treated with imazapic, imazethapyr applied POST, and metolachlor resulted in higher peanut yields than did untreated control plots.Nomenclature: Imazapic; imazethapyr; metolachlor; yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. #3 CYPES; peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘GK-7’.Additional index words: ALS inhibitors, efficacy, tuber density.Abbreviations: EPOST, early postemergence; POST, postemergence; PPI, preplant incorporated; PRE, preemergence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides controlled yellow nutsedge by at least 75% after three years.

Treatment
All herbicidese0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
at least 75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicides controlled yellow nutsedge at least 75% after 3 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic at both stated rates controlled yellow nutsedge more consistently than imazethapyr or metolachlor.

Treatment
Imazapic at 0.05 and 0.07 kg/hae0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
more consistentlye0
Comparator
imazethapyr or metolachlore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazapic at 0.05 and 0.07 kg/ha controlled yellow nutsedge more consistently than did imazethapyr or metolachlor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–516 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence imazethapyr controlled yellow nutsedge more effectively than preplant incorporated imazethapyr.

Treatment
Imazethapyr applied POSTe0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
yellow nutsedgee0
Direction
more effectivelye0
Comparator
imazethapyr applied PPIe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Imazethapyr applied POST controlled yellow nutsedge more effectively than did imazethapyr applied PPI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide-treated plots had 51 to 75% lower yellow nutsedge tuber densities than untreated plots.

Treatment
herbicide-treated plotse0
Interactor
Yellow nutsedgee0weed
Outcome
Yellow nutsedge tuber densitiese0
Direction
less thane0
Value
51 to 75%e0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yellow nutsedge tuber densities in herbicide-treated plots were 51 to 75% less than in untreated control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapic-treated plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.

Treatment
imazapice0
Outcome
peanut yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with imazapic, imazethapyr applied POST, and metolachlor resulted in higher peanut yields than did untreated control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–869 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence imazethapyr plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.

Treatment
imazethapyr applied POSTe0
Outcome
peanut yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with imazapic, imazethapyr applied POST, and metolachlor resulted in higher peanut yields than did untreated control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–869 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metolachlor-treated plots produced higher peanut yields than untreated plots.

Treatment
metolachlore0
Outcome
peanut yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated control plotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plots treated with imazapic, imazethapyr applied POST, and metolachlor resulted in higher peanut yields than did untreated control plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–869 · show in text ↑

metolachlor · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

imazapic · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Imazethapyr · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 41 positive, 5 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

herbicide · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

230 papers: 172 positive, 58 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

226 papers more in this group

See all 230 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.